Urology Department, Institute of Urology, Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Obes Surg. 2019 Jun;29(6):1756-1764. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03744-4.
Knotless barbed sutures can eliminate knot tying during the bariatric surgery (BS). Since effects reported on patients and surgeons are ambiguous, this study is determined to identify the effectiveness and safety of knotless barbed suture in BS.
PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Register of Clinical Studies, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing barbed sutures with conventional sutures in BS (until July 2, 2018). Quality assessment was conducted due to Cochrane's recommendations. Review Manager was applied to analyze the data, and we performed subgroup analyses based on study design type and surgery type.
A total of four cohort studies (25,505 patients, low to moderate risk of bias) and four RCTs (1480 patients, low to moderate risk of bias) proved eligible. BS includes laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Comparing to conventional suture, pooling data showed that suture time (MD = - 4.87, 95%CI - 8.82 to - 0.92, P = 0.02) and operative time (MD = - 7.88, 95%CI - 14.10 to - 1.67, P = 0.01) declined significantly in the barbed group. Although no significant change was in the overall postoperative complications and hospital stay, subgroup analysis of RCTs suggested that significantly, fewer bleeding conditions happened in barbed groups.
Although quality of all the studies was relatively moderate and the number of the included studies was limited, the barbed suture may have the potentiality to be an effective and reliable technique and extend the application in other bariatric surgeries. More evidence with randomized design, larger sample sizes, and longer follow-up need to compel validations of this state-of-the-art in the future.
无结带线缝合可以消除减重手术(BS)中的打结过程。由于目前报道的关于患者和外科医生的效果尚不清楚,因此本研究旨在确定无结带线缝合在 BS 中的有效性和安全性。
检索了 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 临床研究注册中心和 ClinicalTrials.gov,以查找比较 BS 中带线缝合与传统缝合的随机对照试验(RCT)和队列研究(截至 2018 年 7 月 2 日)。根据 Cochrane 的建议进行了质量评估。使用 Review Manager 分析数据,并根据研究设计类型和手术类型进行了亚组分析。
共有四项队列研究(25505 例患者,低至中度偏倚风险)和四项 RCT(1480 例患者,低至中度偏倚风险)符合纳入标准。BS 包括腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和腹腔镜袖状胃切除术。与传统缝线相比,汇总数据显示,带线组的缝合时间(MD=-4.87,95%CI-8.82 至-0.92,P=0.02)和手术时间(MD=-7.88,95%CI-14.10 至-1.67,P=0.01)显著缩短。尽管总体术后并发症和住院时间没有明显变化,但 RCT 的亚组分析表明,带线组的出血情况明显减少。
尽管所有研究的质量相对中等,且纳入研究的数量有限,但带线缝合可能具有有效性和可靠性,并且可能会扩展到其他减重手术中的应用。未来需要更多具有随机设计、更大样本量和更长随访时间的证据来验证这种最新技术。