Suppr超能文献

早期发现的妊娠期糖尿病的妊娠结局:卡塔尔的回顾性对比队列研究。

Pregnancy outcomes of early detected gestational diabetes: a retrospective comparison cohort study, Qatar.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Qatar Metabolic Institute, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Women's Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e023612. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023612.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare pregnancy outcomes in patients with early versus usual gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

The Women's Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar.

PARTICIPANTS

GDM women who attended and delivered in the Women's Hospital, between January and December 2016. GDM was diagnosed based on the 2013-WHO criteria. The study included 801 patients; of which, 273 E-GDM and 528 U-GDM. Early GDM (E-GDM) and usual GDM (U-GDM) were defined as GDM detected before and after 24 weeks' gestation, respectively.

OUTCOMES

Maternal and neonatal outcomes and the impact of timing of GDM-diagnosis on pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

At conception, E-GDM women were older (mean age 33.5±5.4 vs 32.0±5.4 years, p<0.001) and had higher body mass index (33.0±6.3 vs 31.7±6.1 kg/m, p=0.0059) compared with U-GDM. The mean fasting, and 1-hour blood glucose levels were significantly higher in E-GDM vs U-GDM, respectively (5.3±0.7 vs 4.0±0.7 mmol/L, p<0.001 and 10.6±1.7 vs 10.3±1.6 mmol/L, p<0.001). More patients in the U-GDM were managed on diet alone compared with E-GDM (53.6% vs 27.5%, p<0.001). E-GDM subjects gained less weight per week compared with U-GDM (0.02±0.03 vs 0.12±0.03 kg/week, p=0.0274). Maternal outcomes were similar between the two groups apart from a higher incidence of preterm labour (25.5% vs 14.4%; p<0.001) and caesarean section (52.4% vs 42.8%; p=0.01) in E-GDM vs U-GDM, respectively. After correction for covariates; gestational age at which GDM was diagnosed was associated with increased risk of macrosomia (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11; p<0.05) and neonatal hypoglycaemia (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11; p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our data support the concept of early screening and treatment of GDM in high-risk patients. More data are needed to examine the optimal time for screening.

摘要

目的

比较早发型和常规型妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)患者的妊娠结局。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

卡塔尔哈马德医疗公司妇女医院。

参与者

2016 年 1 月至 12 月期间在妇女医院就诊并分娩的 GDM 患者。GDM 的诊断基于 2013 年世界卫生组织(WHO)标准。研究纳入了 801 例患者,其中 273 例为早发型 GDM(E-GDM),528 例为常规型 GDM(U-GDM)。早发型 GDM(E-GDM)和常规型 GDM(U-GDM)分别定义为妊娠 24 周前和妊娠 24 周后发现的 GDM。

结局

母婴结局以及 GDM 诊断时间对妊娠结局的影响。

结果

在受孕时,E-GDM 患者年龄更大(平均年龄 33.5±5.4 岁 vs 32.0±5.4 岁,p<0.001),体重指数(BMI)更高(33.0±6.3 kg/m2 vs 31.7±6.1 kg/m2,p=0.0059)。与 U-GDM 相比,E-GDM 的空腹和 1 小时血糖水平显著更高(5.3±0.7 mmol/L vs 4.0±0.7 mmol/L,p<0.001 和 10.6±1.7 mmol/L vs 10.3±1.6 mmol/L,p<0.001)。与 E-GDM 相比,U-GDM 中有更多患者仅通过饮食进行管理(53.6% vs 27.5%,p<0.001)。E-GDM 患者每周体重增加量较 U-GDM 少(0.02±0.03 kg/周 vs 0.12±0.03 kg/周,p=0.0274)。除了 E-GDM 中早产(25.5% vs 14.4%;p<0.001)和剖宫产(52.4% vs 42.8%;p=0.01)的发生率较高外,两组间的母婴结局相似。在校正了混杂因素后;GDM 的诊断时间与巨大儿(OR 1.06,95%CI 1.00 至 1.11;p<0.05)和新生儿低血糖(OR 1.05,95%CI 1.00 至 1.11;p<0.05)的风险增加相关。

结论

我们的数据支持对高危患者进行早期筛查和治疗 GDM 的概念。需要更多的数据来检查最佳的筛查时间。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Time to Move Beyond a Binary Criterion for Gestational Diabetes?是否应该超越二元标准来诊断妊娠糖尿病?
Reprod Sci. 2024 Jul;31(7):2073-2079. doi: 10.1007/s43032-024-01514-x. Epub 2024 Mar 14.

本文引用的文献

1
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: .2. 糖尿病的分类和诊断: 。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S13-S27. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S002.
9
Metformin for the treatment of gestational diabetes: An updated meta-analysis.二甲双胍治疗妊娠期糖尿病:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015 Sep;109(3):521-32. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.05.017. Epub 2015 May 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验