Suppr超能文献

597 例国际军事队列战伤下肢穿透性动脉损伤的处理与结局。

Management and outcome of 597 wartime penetrating lower extremity arterial injuries from an international military cohort.

机构信息

Regeneration, Repair and Development Section, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom; Royal British Legion Centre for Blast Injury Studies, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom; Academic Department of Military Surgery and Trauma, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Academic Department of Military Surgery and Trauma, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Centre for Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Queen Mary University, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jul;70(1):224-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.11.024. Epub 2019 Feb 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Vascular injury is a leading cause of death and disability in military and civilian settings. Most wartime and an increasing amount of civilian vascular trauma arises from penetrating mechanisms of injury due to gunshot or explosion. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive examination of penetrating lower extremity arterial injury and to characterize long-term limb salvage and differences related to mechanisms of injury.

METHODS

The military trauma registries of the United States and the United Kingdom were analyzed to identify service members who sustained penetrating lower limb arterial injury (2001-2014). Treatment and limb salvage data were studied and comparisons made of patients whose penetrating vascular trauma arose from explosion (group 1) vs gunshot (group 2). Standardized statistical testing was used, with Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 568 combat casualties (mean age, 25.2 years) with 597 injuries (explosion, n = 416; gunshot, n = 181). Group 1 had higher Injury Severity Score (P < .05) and Mangled Extremity Severity Score (P < .0001), required more blood transfusion (P < .05), and had more tibial (P < .01) and popliteal (P < .05) arterial injuries; group 2 had more profunda femoris injuries (P < .05). Initial surgical management for the whole cohort included vein interposition graft (33%), ligation (31%), primary repair with or without patch angioplasty (16%), temporary vascular shunting (15%), and primary amputation (6%). No difference in patency of arterial reconstruction was found between group 1 and group 2, although group 1 had a higher incidence of primary (13% vs 2%; P < .05) and secondary (19% vs 9%; P < .05) amputation. Similarly, longer term freedom from amputation was lower for group 1 than for group 2 (68% vs 89% at 5.5 years; Cox hazard ratio, 0.30; P < .0001), as was physical functioning (36-Item Short Form Health Survey data; mean, 39.80 vs 43.20; P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of wartime lower extremity arterial injuries result from an explosive mechanism that preferentially affects the tibial vasculature and results in poorer long-term limb salvage compared with those injured with firearms. The mortality associated with immediate limb salvage attempts is low, and delayed amputations occur weeks later, affording the patient involvement in the decision-making and rehabilitation planning. We recommend assertive attempts at vascular repair and limb salvage for service members injured by explosive and gunshot mechanisms.

摘要

目的

血管损伤是导致军事和民用环境中死亡和残疾的主要原因。大多数战时和越来越多的民用血管创伤是由于枪击或爆炸导致的穿透性损伤机制引起的。本研究的目的是全面检查穿透性下肢动脉损伤,并描述与损伤机制相关的长期肢体保存和差异。

方法

分析美国和英国的军事创伤登记处,以确定患有穿透性下肢动脉损伤的军人(2001-2014 年)。研究治疗和肢体保存数据,并对因爆炸(第 1 组)和枪击(第 2 组)导致穿透性血管损伤的患者进行比较。使用标准化统计检验,并对多次比较进行 Bonferroni 校正。

结果

该队列包括 568 名作战伤员(平均年龄 25.2 岁),共 597 处损伤(爆炸伤 416 例,枪击伤 181 例)。第 1 组的损伤严重度评分(ISS)(P <.05)和严重肢体损伤评分(MESS)(P <.0001)更高,需要更多的输血(P <.05),并且更多的发生在胫骨(P <.01)和腘动脉(P <.05)损伤;第 2 组更多地发生股深动脉损伤(P <.05)。整个队列的初始手术治疗包括静脉间置移植物(33%)、结扎(31%)、带或不带补片血管成形术的一期修复(16%)、临时血管转流(15%)和一期截肢(6%)。第 1 组和第 2 组的动脉重建通畅率无差异,但第 1 组的一期(13% vs 2%;P <.05)和二期(19% vs 9%;P <.05)截肢率更高。同样,第 1 组的长期免于截肢率低于第 2 组(5.5 年时分别为 68%和 89%;Cox 风险比,0.30;P <.0001),身体功能(36-项简短健康调查问卷数据;平均值,39.80 与 43.20;P <.05)也较低。

结论

大多数战时下肢动脉损伤是由爆炸机制引起的,该机制优先影响胫骨血管系统,与火器所致损伤相比,长期肢体保存效果较差。立即进行肢体挽救尝试的死亡率较低,几周后发生延迟性截肢,使患者有机会参与决策和康复计划。我们建议对因爆炸和枪击机制受伤的军人积极尝试进行血管修复和肢体保存。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验