• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用保留止点的自体腘绳肌腱重建功能性双束前交叉韧带是治疗胫骨股骨不稳定的有效方法。

Functional double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts with preserved insertions is an effective treatment for tibiofemoral instability.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, The General Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Nov;27(11):3471-3480. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05401-w. Epub 2019 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00167-019-05401-w
PMID:30796489
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to introduce a modified anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using functional double bundles (F-DBACLR), which achieved sequential tensioning at all flexion angles postoperatively, and compare its clinical outcomes with the anatomical single-bundle technique (A-SBACLR).

METHODS

A total of 156 patients with an ACL injury underwent ACLR (A-SB group, n = 78; F-DB group, n = 78). All operations were performed by anatomically identifying the ACL footprints and fixing the graft at a pre-determined degree of knee flexion. Two observers blinded to the patient identities examined the patients preoperatively and during follow-up (median 28.2 months; range 26-31 months). Multiple subjective and objective clinical evaluation tests and assessment of clinical outcomes concerning the translational and rotational stability of the knee including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Tegner Activity Scale, KT-1000 laxity measurements, Lachman test and pivot-shift test were performed preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, no differences were found between the two groups. During the 2-year observation period, patients in the F-DB group revealed better clinical outcomes in terms of the Tegner Activity Scale Score, IKDC, KOOS and Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale. Similar results were shown in regard to the translational stability in both groups, while the F-DB group had more rotational stability at 2 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical outcomes indicated that F-DBACLR is clinically practicable and advantageous in the treatment of the ACL-deficient knee.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在介绍一种改良的解剖学前交叉韧带重建术,即功能双束(F-DBACLR),该术式在术后的所有屈伸角度都能实现序贯紧张,并将其与解剖学单束技术(A-SBACLR)的临床结果进行比较。

方法

共 156 例 ACL 损伤患者接受 ACLR(A-SB 组,n=78;F-DB 组,n=78)。所有手术均通过解剖学方法识别 ACL 足迹,并在预先确定的膝关节屈曲度固定移植物。两名对患者身份不知情的观察者在术前和随访期间(中位数 28.2 个月;范围 26-31 个月)检查患者。使用国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)问卷、Lysholm 膝关节评分量表、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)、Tegner 活动量表、KT-1000 松弛度测量、Lachman 试验和枢轴转移试验对膝关节的平移和旋转稳定性进行了多项主观和客观的临床评估测试和评估。

结果

术前两组间无差异。在 2 年的观察期内,F-DB 组患者的 Tegner 活动量表评分、IKDC、KOOS 和 Lysholm 膝关节评分量表的临床结果更好。两组间的平移稳定性也显示出类似的结果,而 F-DB 组在 2 年随访时具有更好的旋转稳定性。

结论

临床结果表明,F-DBACLR 在治疗 ACL 缺失的膝关节方面具有临床可行性和优势。

证据水平

II。

相似文献

1
Functional double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts with preserved insertions is an effective treatment for tibiofemoral instability.采用保留止点的自体腘绳肌腱重建功能性双束前交叉韧带是治疗胫骨股骨不稳定的有效方法。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Nov;27(11):3471-3480. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05401-w. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
2
Irradiated Hamstring Tendon Allograft Versus Autograft for Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Midterm Clinical Outcomes.照射异体腘绳肌腱与自体肌腱用于解剖双束前交叉韧带重建:中期临床结果
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):2579-2588. doi: 10.1177/0363546516655333. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
3
Comparison of Anatomic Double- and Single-Bundle Techniques for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Tendon Autografts: A Prospective Randomized Study With 5-Year Clinical and Radiographic Follow-up.使用自体腘绳肌腱进行前交叉韧带重建的解剖双束与单束技术比较:一项为期5年的临床和影像学随访的前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2016 May;44(5):1225-36. doi: 10.1177/0363546515626543. Epub 2016 Mar 6.
4
Outcomes of Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Bone-Quadriceps Tendon Graft Versus Double-Bundle Hamstring Tendon Graft.解剖学前交叉韧带重建的结果:骨-股四头肌腱移植与双束腘绳肌腱移植对比
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Sep;44(9):2323-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546516650666. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
5
Comparison Between Single- and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With 6- to 8-Stranded Hamstring Autograft: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial.6至8股自体腘绳肌腱单束与双束前交叉韧带重建的比较:一项前瞻性随机临床试验
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Sep;44(9):2314-22. doi: 10.1177/0363546516650876. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
6
Long-Term Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Either Synthetics With Remnant Preservation or Hamstring Autografts: A 10-Year Longitudinal Study.使用保留残端的合成材料或自体腘绳肌腱进行前交叉韧带重建的长期结果:一项为期10年的纵向研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Oct;45(12):2739-2750. doi: 10.1177/0363546517721692. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
7
Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Not Superior to Anatomic Single-Bundle Reconstruction at 10-Year Follow-up: A Randomized Clinical Trial.解剖双束前交叉韧带重建在 10 年随访中并不优于解剖单束重建:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Nov;50(13):3477-3486. doi: 10.1177/03635465221128566. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
8
Quadriceps tendon autograft ACL reconstruction has less pivot shift laxity and lower failure rates than hamstring tendon autografts.四头肌腱自体移植物 ACL 重建的膝关节旋转不稳定松弛度小于腘绳肌腱自体移植物,且失败率较低。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Feb;28(2):509-518. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05720-y. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
9
Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with ipsi- or contralateral hamstring tendon grafts.采用同侧或对侧腘绳肌腱移植进行前交叉韧带重建翻修术。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 May;27(4):533-537. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1894-4. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
10
Increased knee laxity with hamstring tendon autograft compared to patellar tendon autograft: a cohort study of 5462 patients with primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.与髌腱自体移植物相比,腘绳肌腱自体移植物可增加膝关节松弛度:5462 例初次前交叉韧带重建患者的队列研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Feb;27(2):381-388. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5029-9. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Double-Bundle Versus Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Knee Stability Outcomes.双束与单束前交叉韧带(ACL)重建:膝关节稳定性结果的系统评价与荟萃分析
Cureus. 2024 Dec 9;16(12):e75352. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75352. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Single Bundle Versus Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.单束与双束前交叉韧带重建:系统评价与荟萃分析
Indian J Orthop. 2022 Aug 29;56(10):1669-1684. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00718-0. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
No Difference in Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with "Bone-patellar Tendon-bone versus Semitendinosus-gracilis Graft with Preserved Insertion": A Randomized Clinical Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Tendon Autograft With Preserved Insertions.使用保留止点的自体腘绳肌腱重建前交叉韧带
Arthrosc Tech. 2016 Mar 21;5(2):e269-74. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2015.12.007. eCollection 2016 Apr.
2
Comparison of Anatomic Double- and Single-Bundle Techniques for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Tendon Autografts: A Prospective Randomized Study With 5-Year Clinical and Radiographic Follow-up.使用自体腘绳肌腱进行前交叉韧带重建的解剖双束与单束技术比较:一项为期5年的临床和影像学随访的前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2016 May;44(5):1225-36. doi: 10.1177/0363546515626543. Epub 2016 Mar 6.
3
“保留止点的髌腱-骨移植与半腱肌-股薄肌移植用于前交叉韧带重建的疗效无差异:一项随机临床试验”
Indian J Orthop. 2020 Apr 28;54(5):665-671. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00073-y. eCollection 2020 Sep.
4
No Difference in Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with "Bone-patellar Tendon-bone versus Semitendinosus-gracilis Graft with Preserved Insertion:" A Randomized Clinical Trial.“保留止点的髌腱-骨移植与半腱肌-股薄肌移植在前交叉韧带重建中的疗效无差异:一项随机临床试验”
Indian J Orthop. 2019 Nov-Dec;53(6):721-726. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_214_19.
Single-Bundle Versus Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative 2-Year Follow-up.
单束与双束前交叉韧带重建:2年比较随访
Arthroscopy. 2016 Jan;32(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.029. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
4
Individualized anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.个体化解剖学前交叉韧带重建术
Phys Sportsmed. 2015 Feb;43(1):87-92. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2015.1005545.
5
Preservation of hamstring tibial insertion in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review of the current literature.前交叉韧带重建术中腘绳肌腱胫骨止点的保留:当前文献综述
Musculoskelet Surg. 2015 Aug;99(2):87-92. doi: 10.1007/s12306-015-0346-3. Epub 2015 Feb 8.
6
No difference in revision rates between single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparative study of 16,791 patients from the Swedish national knee ligament register.单束与双束前交叉韧带重建的翻修率无差异:一项对瑞典国家膝关节韧带登记处16791例患者的比较研究。
Arthroscopy. 2015 Apr;31(4):659-64. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.030. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
7
Does Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improve Postoperative Knee Stability Compared With Single-Bundle Techniques? A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses.与单束技术相比,双束前交叉韧带重建术是否能改善术后膝关节稳定性?重叠荟萃分析的系统评价
Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun;31(6):1185-96. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.014. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
8
Prospective randomized comparison of knee stability and joint degeneration for double- and single-bundle ACL reconstruction.双束和单束前交叉韧带重建术后膝关节稳定性和关节退变的前瞻性随机对照研究
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Apr;23(4):1171-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2934-4.
9
Anatomic single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis.解剖单束与双束前交叉韧带重建:一项荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 May;22(5):1009-23. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2811-6. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
10
Progression of osteoarthritis after double- and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.双束与单束前交叉韧带重建术后骨关节炎的进展。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Oct;41(10):2340-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546513498998. Epub 2013 Aug 19.