Department of Integrative Biology, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, VIT, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Integrative Biology, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, VIT, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2019;115:351-369. doi: 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2018.11.006. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
DNA repair mechanism is a process through which the cell repairs its damaged DNA. Although there are several mechanisms involved in the DNA repair mechanisms, the direct reversal method is the simplest and does not require a reference template, in which the guanine bases are often methylated, and the methyl guanine methyl transferase protein (MGMT) reverses them. The mutations occurring in the MGMT protein might result in dysfunction of such DNA repair mechanism. In this study, we attempted to evaluate the impact of six missense mutations (Y114E, Y114A, R128G, R128A, R128K, and C145A) at three active-site positions (Y114, C145, and R128) as this might hinder the DNA binding to the protein. These six mutations were subjected to pathogenicity, stability, and conservation analysis using online servers such as PredictSNP, iStable, and ConSurf, respectively. From the predictions, all the six mutations were almost predicted to be significant. Considering true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives, three mutations (Y114E, R128G, and C145A) showed "loss of DNA repair activity," and were analyzed further using molecular dynamics simulations (MDS) using GROMACS for 50ns. MDS run showed that the C145A mutant demonstrated higher structural deviation, decreased compactness, and the binding patterns. The Y114E mutant showed almost a null effect from the structural analysis. Finally, the R128G mutant showed structural variations in between the C145A and Y114E mutations of MGMT protein. We believe that the observed findings in this computational approach might further pave a way of providing better treatment measures by understanding the DNA repair mechanisms.
DNA 修复机制是细胞修复受损 DNA 的过程。虽然有几种机制参与 DNA 修复机制,但直接反转方法是最简单的,不需要参考模板,其中鸟嘌呤碱基经常被甲基化,甲基鸟嘌呤甲基转移酶蛋白(MGMT)将其反转。MGMT 蛋白中的突变可能导致这种 DNA 修复机制失能。在这项研究中,我们试图评估六个错义突变(Y114E、Y114A、R128G、R128A、R128K 和 C145A)在三个活性位点(Y114、C145 和 R128)的影响,因为这可能会阻碍 DNA 与蛋白质的结合。使用 PredictSNP、iStable 和 ConSurf 等在线服务器,分别对这六个突变进行了致病性、稳定性和保守性分析。从预测结果来看,所有六个突变几乎都被预测为显著。考虑真阳性、真阴性、假阳性和假阴性,三个突变(Y114E、R128G 和 C145A)显示出“丧失 DNA 修复活性”,并使用 GROMACS 进行 50ns 的分子动力学模拟(MDS)进一步分析。MDS 运行表明,C145A 突变体表现出更高的结构偏差、降低的紧凑性和结合模式。Y114E 突变体从结构分析中几乎没有表现出任何影响。最后,R128G 突变体在 MGMT 蛋白的 C145A 和 Y114E 突变之间表现出结构变化。我们相信,在这种计算方法中观察到的发现可能会通过了解 DNA 修复机制,为提供更好的治疗措施铺平道路。