G Horneff John, Syed Usman Ali, Seidl Adam, Britton Jessica, Williams Gerald, Abboud Joseph
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO.
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019 Jan;7(1):12-18.
The purpose of this study was to determine a correlation between surgical case order and the length of operative time, total length of time in the operating room, time until discharge from the hospital, and the incidence of intraoperative complications for primary total shoulder arthroplasty cases.
A retrospective review was conducted of records for all individual primary total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty at a single hospital. In order to compare true parameters and minimize variables, only the cases performed by one senior author were analyzed. Operative and hospital records were reviewed.
There were 162 primary TSA and with the following order: 55 first order cases, 46 second order cases, 34 third order cases, 21 fourth order cases, and six fifth order cases. There were 71 primary rTSA patients included (27: 27:10:6:1). Length of stay was statistically increased for both female gender (8.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI)= 0.5-16.7%; ) and fourth case order compared to first case (13.3%; 95% CI = 0.6%; 27.6%) ). For reverse TSA, there was no analyzed predictor that was significant.
Even between anatomic TSA and reverse TSA patients, there was variability in what factors played a part in case inpatient length of stay. As such, we believe that this study highlights that case order can have an effect on operating room parameters for shoulder arthroplasty patients. The need for larger studies remains to better define that effect.
本研究的目的是确定手术病例顺序与初次全肩关节置换术病例的手术时间、在手术室的总时长、出院时间以及术中并发症发生率之间的相关性。
对一家医院所有个体初次全肩关节置换术和反式全肩关节置换术的记录进行回顾性分析。为了比较真实参数并尽量减少变量,仅分析由一位资深作者实施的病例。对手术和医院记录进行了审查。
有162例初次全肩关节置换术,顺序如下:55例为第一顺序病例,46例为第二顺序病例,34例为第三顺序病例,21例为第四顺序病例,6例为第五顺序病例。纳入71例初次反式全肩关节置换术患者(27:27:10:6:1)。与第一例相比,女性患者的住院时间(8.3%;95%置信区间(CI)=0.5 - 16.7%)和第四例顺序的住院时间(13.3%;95%CI = 0.6%;27.6%)在统计学上均有所增加。对于反式全肩关节置换术,没有分析出有显著意义的预测因素。
即使在解剖型全肩关节置换术和反式全肩关节置换术患者之间,影响住院时间的因素也存在差异。因此,我们认为本研究强调病例顺序会对肩关节置换术患者的手术室参数产生影响。仍需要更大规模的研究来更好地界定这种影响。