• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷包缝合与线性皮肤缝合在回肠袢式造口还纳术中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Purse-string vs. linear skin closure at loop ileostomy reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Taylor Pavilion, Suite D-365, 100 Woods Road, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA.

出版信息

Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Mar;23(3):207-220. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-01952-9. Epub 2019 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1007/s10151-019-01952-9
PMID:30809775
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is no level 1a evidence regarding the best technique for skin closure at loop ileostomy reversal. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether purse-string skin closure (PSC) is associated with lower surgical site infection (SSI) rates as compared to linear skin closure (LC).

METHODS

EMBASE, MEDLINE, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases were systematically searched. PSC was defined as a circumferential subcuticular suture leaving a small circular skin defect allowing for free drainage, granulation, and epithelialization. In LC, the wound edges were approximated side to side with or without drainage. The primary endpoint was SSI rate. Secondary endpoints included operating time, length of hospital stay, wound healing time, and incisional hernia rates.

STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criterion was any observational or experimental study comparing PSC to LC in patients undergoing ostomy reversal.

RESULTS

Twenty studies (6 experimental and 14 observational) totaling 1812 patients (826 PSC and 986 LC) were included. SSI rates were significantly lower statistically and clinically in patients with PSC [OR (95% CI) = 0.14 (0.09, 0.21); p < 0.0001; NNT = 6] in the meta-analysis of all studies. The subgroup analysis of randomized trials [OR (95% CI) = 0.10 (0.04, 0.21); p < 0.0001; NNT = 6] as well as the analysis of randomized trials including patients with loop ileostomy only [OR (95% CI) = 0.12 (0.05, 0.28); p < 0.0001; NNT = 5] confirmed this finding.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis found that PSC was associated with significantly decreased rates of SSI in patients undergoing loop ileostomy reversal.

摘要

背景

在回肠袢式造口还纳术中,哪种皮肤缝合技术最优尚无 1a 级证据。本研究旨在评估荷包缝合(PSC)与线性缝合(LC)相比,是否可降低手术部位感染(SSI)的发生率。

方法

系统检索了 EMBASE、MEDLINE、PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science 和 CINAHL 数据库。PSC 定义为一种环行皮下缝线,留下一个小的圆形皮肤缺损,允许自由引流、肉芽形成和上皮化。LC 中,切口边缘侧向对合,有无引流均可。主要终点为 SSI 发生率。次要终点包括手术时间、住院时间、伤口愈合时间和切口疝发生率。

研究选择

纳入标准为比较 PSC 与 LC 治疗行造口还纳术患者的任何观察性或实验性研究。

结果

共纳入 20 项研究(6 项实验性研究和 14 项观察性研究),总计 1812 例患者(PSC 组 826 例,LC 组 986 例)。所有研究的荟萃分析显示,PSC 组患者 SSI 发生率显著低于 LC 组[比值比(OR)(95%可信区间)=0.14(0.09,0.21);p<0.0001;NNH=6]。随机试验亚组分析[OR(95%可信区间)=0.10(0.04,0.21);p<0.0001;NNH=6]和仅包括回肠袢式造口患者的随机试验分析[OR(95%可信区间)=0.12(0.05,0.28);p<0.0001;NNH=5]证实了这一发现。

结论

本荟萃分析发现,在接受回肠袢式造口还纳术的患者中,PSC 可显著降低 SSI 发生率。

相似文献

1
Purse-string vs. linear skin closure at loop ileostomy reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.荷包缝合与线性皮肤缝合在回肠袢式造口还纳术中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Mar;23(3):207-220. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-01952-9. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
2
[Efficacy comparison of purse-string vs. linear closure of the wound following stoma reversal: systematic review and meta-analysis].[造口回纳术后伤口荷包缝合与直线缝合的疗效比较:系统评价与荟萃分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 25;22(12):1188-1195. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.12.016.
3
Purse-string skin closure versus linear skin closure in people undergoing stoma reversal.造口回纳术患者荷包式皮肤缝合与直线式皮肤缝合的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 12;3(3):CD014763. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014763.pub2.
4
Purse-string closure versus conventional primary closure of wound following stoma reversal: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.荷包缝合与常规缝合在肠造口还纳术后的对比:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Apr;52:208-213. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.027. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
5
Purse-string versus linear closure of the skin wound following stoma reversal: A meta-analysis with RCT and systematic review.荷包缝合与线性缝合在肠造口还纳术后皮肤切口关闭中的应用:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析及系统综述。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Aug 30;103(35):e39477. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039477.
6
[Gunsight closure versus purse-string closure techniques in loop stoma reversal: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial].回肠造口还纳术中瞄准器闭合术与荷包缝合闭合术的比较:一项多中心前瞻性随机对照试验
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Aug 1;58(8):608-613. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20200421-00315.
7
Role of subcutaneous closed suction drain in the prevention of incisional surgical site infection after loop ileostomy reversal with purse-string skin closure: a retrospective observational study.皮内缝合荷包关闭式回肠袢式造口还纳术后应用皮下密闭式负压引流预防切口手术部位感染的效果:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMC Surg. 2024 Sep 9;24(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02549-2.
8
The effect of purse-string approximation versus linear approximation of ileostomy reversal wounds on morbidity rates and patient satisfaction: the 'STOMA' trial.荷包缝合与线性缝合回肠造口还纳术对术后并发症发生率和患者满意度的影响:STOMA 试验。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Nov;21(11):863-868. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1713-x. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
9
Quality of life following ostomy reversal with purse-string vs linear skin closure: a systematic review.荷包缝合与直线皮肤缝合回纳造口术后的生活质量:一项系统评价
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Feb;34(2):209-216. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3219-z. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
10
The use of purse-string skin closure in loop ileostomy reversals leads to lower wound infection rates--a single high-volume centre experience.在回肠造口术回纳术中使用荷包缝合皮肤可降低伤口感染率——来自一个高容量单中心的经验
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Jun;29(6):709-14. doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1822-6. Epub 2014 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of different skin suturing methods on patient prognosis after ileostomy closure.不同皮肤缝合方法对回肠造口关闭术后患者预后的影响。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jul 27;17(7):106560. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106560.
2
Comparison of Running Versus Interrupted Sutures for Fascial Closure in Ileostomy Takedown.回肠造口关闭术中连续缝合与间断缝合用于筋膜闭合的比较。
Curr Health Sci J. 2025 Jan-Mar;51(1):72-80. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.51.01.07. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
3
Prevalence and risk factors of incisional hernia after ileostomy reversal: meta-analysis with meta-regression.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing Surgical Site Infection and Scar Cosmesis Between Conventional Linear Skin Closure Versus Purse-string Skin Closure in Stoma Reversal - A Randomized Controlled Trial.造口回纳术中传统线性皮肤缝合与荷包式皮肤缝合的手术部位感染及瘢痕美观度比较——一项随机对照试验
Cureus. 2018 Feb 11;10(2):e2181. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2181.
2
Purse-string closure technique reduces the incidence of incisional hernias following the reversal of temporary ileostomy.荷包缝合关闭技术可降低临时回肠造口回纳术后切口疝的发生率。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Jul;33(7):973-977. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-2986-x. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
3
The effect of purse-string approximation versus linear approximation of ileostomy reversal wounds on morbidity rates and patient satisfaction: the 'STOMA' trial.
回肠造口术逆转术后切口疝的患病率及危险因素:Meta分析与Meta回归
Hernia. 2025 Jun 16;29(1):204. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03367-y.
4
Incidence and Risk Factors for Incisional Hernia Following Ileostomy Takedown: A Retrospective Cohort Study.回肠造口术关闭术后切口疝的发生率及危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 May 21;14(10):3597. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103597.
5
Circular (purse-string) vs primary skin closure following stoma closure: an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis.造口关闭术后环形(荷包缝合法)与一期皮肤缝合:最新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Apr 5;29(1):93. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03135-1.
6
The use of negative pressure wound therapy following stoma reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.造口回纳术后负压伤口治疗的应用:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Mar 20;40(1):73. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04865-2.
7
Development of a novel nomogram for the prediction of surgical site infection risk after loop ileostomy closure.一种用于预测回肠造口闭合术后手术部位感染风险的新型列线图的开发。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Dec 20;39(1):207. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04786-6.
8
Current approach to loop ileostomy closure: a nationwide survey on behalf of the Italian Society of ColoRectal Surgery (SICCR).回肠造口关闭术的当前方法:代表意大利结直肠外科学会(SICCR)开展的全国性调查。
Updates Surg. 2025 Jan;77(1):97-106. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-02033-9. Epub 2024 Nov 9.
9
Role of subcutaneous closed suction drain in the prevention of incisional surgical site infection after loop ileostomy reversal with purse-string skin closure: a retrospective observational study.皮内缝合荷包关闭式回肠袢式造口还纳术后应用皮下密闭式负压引流预防切口手术部位感染的效果:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMC Surg. 2024 Sep 9;24(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02549-2.
10
Clinical impact of a multimodal pain management protocol for loop ileostomy reversal.用于回肠造口术回纳的多模式疼痛管理方案的临床影响
Ann Coloproctol. 2024 Jun;40(3):210-216. doi: 10.3393/ac.2022.01137.0162. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
荷包缝合与线性缝合回肠造口还纳术对术后并发症发生率和患者满意度的影响:STOMA 试验。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Nov;21(11):863-868. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1713-x. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
4
Risk factors for surgical site infection after stoma closure comparison between pursestring wound closure and conventional linear wound closure: Propensity score matching analysis.造口关闭术后手术部位感染的危险因素:荷包缝合伤口关闭与传统线性伤口关闭的比较:倾向评分匹配分析
Am J Surg. 2018 Jan;215(1):58-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.09.031. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
5
Purse-String Versus Linear Conventional Skin Wound Closure of an Ileostomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.回肠造口术的荷包缝合法与传统线性皮肤伤口缝合术:一项随机临床试验
Ann Coloproctol. 2016 Aug;32(4):144-9. doi: 10.3393/ac.2016.32.4.144. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
6
A Retrospective, Single-institution Review of Loop Ileostomy Reversal Outcomes.回肠袢式造口还纳术结局的单机构回顾性研究
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2016 Aug;62(8):22-33.
7
Randomized Controlled Trial of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy at Ostomy Closure for the Prevention of Delayed Wound Healing and Surgical Site Infection in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis.预防性负压伤口治疗在溃疡性结肠炎患者造口闭合术中预防伤口愈合延迟和手术部位感染的随机对照试验
Dig Surg. 2016;33(6):449-54. doi: 10.1159/000446550. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
8
Quality of Life and Timing of Stoma Closure in Patients With Rectal Cancer Undergoing Low Anterior Resection With Diverting Stoma: A Multicenter Longitudinal Observational Study.行低位前切除术并造口分流的直肠癌患者的生活质量及造口关闭时机:一项多中心纵向观察性研究
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Apr;59(4):281-90. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000545.
9
Pursestring Closure versus Conventional Primary Closure Following Stoma Reversal to Reduce Surgical Site Infection Rate: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.造口回纳术后荷包缝合与传统一期缝合以降低手术部位感染率:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Aug;58(8):808-15. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000401.
10
Comparison of surgical techniques for stoma closure: A retrospective study of purse-string skin closure versus conventional skin closure following ileostomy and colostomy reversal.造口关闭手术技术的比较:一项关于回肠造口术和结肠造口术回纳后荷包缝合法皮肤关闭与传统皮肤关闭的回顾性研究。
Mol Clin Oncol. 2015 May;3(3):619-622. doi: 10.3892/mco.2015.505. Epub 2015 Feb 6.