Breloff Scott P, Chou Li-Shan
National Institute of Occupational Safety & Health Morgantown, WV, USA.
Department of Human Physiology University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Biomed Eng (Singapore). 2017;29(4). doi: 10.4015/S1016237217500259. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
The quantification of inter-segmental spine joint reaction forces during common workplace physical demands.
Many spine reaction force models have focused on the L5/S1 or L4/L5 joints to quantify the vertebral joint reaction forces. However, the L5/S1 or L4/L5 approach neglects most of the intervertebral joints.
The current study presents a clinically applicable and noninvasive model which calculates the spinal joint reaction forces at six different regions of the spine. Subjects completed four ambulatory activities of daily living: level walking, obstacle crossing, stair ascent, and stair descent.
Peak joint spinal reaction forces were compared between tasks and spine regions. Differences existed in the bodyweight normalized vertical joint reaction forces where the walking (8.05±3.19N/kg) task had significantly smaller peak reaction forces than the stair descent (12.12±1.32N/kg) agreeing with lower extremity data comparing walking and stair descent tasks.
This method appears to be effective in estimating the joint reaction forces using a segmental spine model. The results suggesting the main effect of peak reactions forces in the segmental spine can be influenced by task.
量化常见工作场所体力需求期间节段间脊柱关节反应力。
许多脊柱反应力模型专注于L5/S1或L4/L5关节以量化椎体关节反应力。然而,L5/S1或L4/L5方法忽略了大多数椎间关节。
当前研究提出了一种临床适用且非侵入性的模型,该模型可计算脊柱六个不同区域的脊柱关节反应力。受试者完成了四项日常行走活动:平地行走、跨越障碍物、上楼梯和下楼梯。
比较了任务和脊柱区域之间的峰值关节脊柱反应力。在体重标准化垂直关节反应力方面存在差异,其中行走(8.05±3.19N/kg)任务的峰值反应力明显小于下楼梯(12.12±1.32N/kg)任务,这与比较行走和下楼梯任务的下肢数据一致。
该方法似乎可有效地使用节段性脊柱模型估计关节反应力。结果表明节段性脊柱中峰值反应力的主要影响可能受任务影响。