1 College of Nursing.
2 Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Jul;16(7):877-885. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201810-735OC.
Implementation of evidence-based best practices is influenced by a variety of contextual factors. It is vital to characterize such factors to maintain high-quality care. Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are critically ill and require complex, interdisciplinary, evidence-based care to enable high-quality outcomes. To identify facilitators and barriers to implementation of an academic-to-community hospital ICU interprofessional quality improvement program, "ICU Innovations." ICU Innovations is a multimodal quality improvement program implemented between 2014 and 2017 in six community ICUs in rural settings serving underserved patients in South Carolina. ICU Innovations includes quarterly on-site seminars and extensive behind the scenes facilitation to catalyze the implementation of evidence-based best practices. We use qualitative analysis to identify contextual factors related to program implementation processes. Guided by an implementation science framework, the Exploration, Adoption/Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment framework, we conducted semistructured key informant interviews with clinician champions at six community ICUs and six parallel interviews with ICU Innovations' leadership. We developed a qualitative coding template based on the framework and identified contextual factors associated with implementation. Standard data on hospital and ICU structure and processes of care were also collected. Outer and inner factors interconnected dynamically to influence implementation of ICU Innovations. Collaborative engagement between the program developers and partner sites (outer context factor) and site program champion leadership and staff readiness for change (inner context factors) were key influences of implementation. This research focused on rural hospital ICUs with limited or nonexistent intensivist leadership. Although enthusiasm for the ICU Innovations program was initially high, implementation was challenging because of multiple contextual factors. Critical steps for implementation of evidence-based practice in rural hospitals include optimizing engagement with external collaborators, maximizing the role of a committed site champion, and conducting thorough site assessments to ensure staff and organizational readiness for change. Identifying barriers and facilitators to program implementation is an on-going process to tailor and improve program initiatives.
实施基于证据的最佳实践受到多种环境因素的影响。描述这些因素对于维持高质量的护理至关重要。重症监护病房(ICU)的患者病情危急,需要复杂的、跨学科的、基于证据的护理,以实现高质量的治疗效果。本研究旨在确定向社区医院 ICU 引入跨专业质量改进项目“ICU 创新”(ICU Innovations)的实施过程中的促进因素和障碍因素。ICU Innovations 是一个多模式的质量改进项目,于 2014 年至 2017 年在南卡罗来纳州农村地区的六个社区 ICU 中实施,为服务不足的患者提供服务。ICU Innovations 包括每季度的现场研讨会和广泛的幕后促进活动,以推动基于证据的最佳实践的实施。我们使用定性分析来确定与项目实施过程相关的环境因素。在实施科学框架的指导下,采用“探索、采用/准备、实施、维持”框架,我们对六个社区 ICU 的临床医生倡导者进行了半结构化的关键知情人访谈,并对 ICU Innovations 的领导层进行了六次平行访谈。我们根据框架制定了定性编码模板,并确定了与实施相关的环境因素。还收集了有关医院和 ICU 结构以及护理过程的标准数据。外部和内部因素相互动态地影响 ICU Innovations 的实施。项目开发者与合作单位之间的协作参与(外部环境因素)以及单位项目倡导人领导能力和员工对变革的准备情况(内部环境因素)是实施的关键影响因素。本研究重点关注农村医院 ICU,这些 ICU 中有限或不存在重症监护专家领导。尽管对 ICU Innovations 项目的热情最初很高,但由于多种环境因素,实施具有挑战性。在农村医院实施基于证据的实践的关键步骤包括优化与外部合作者的合作,最大限度地发挥坚定的现场倡导者的作用,以及进行彻底的现场评估,以确保员工和组织对变革做好准备。确定项目实施的障碍和促进因素是一个持续的过程,旨在调整和改进项目计划。