Baumgarten Mette, Brødsgaard Anne, Bunkenborg Gitte, Nørholm Vibeke, Foss Nicolai Bang
J Perianesth Nurs. 2019 Aug;34(4):717-728. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2018.12.004. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
To examine whether nurse anesthetists and postanesthesia nurses' administration of intravenous (IV) fluid therapy during surgery and in the postanesthesia care unit is based on evidence. Secondarily to investigate if providing indications for IV fluid administration changed nursing practice.
Prospective, descriptive, single-center study in Scandinavia comparing two cohorts.
Descriptive, fluid volume, and type data were obtained in both cohorts. Cohort 1 (n = 126) was used as baseline data. In cohort 2 (n = 130), nurses recorded indications for type and volume of fluid therapy using a validated list. Analysis compared median volumes of crystalloid or colloid fluids of surgical types by cohort. Analysis compared frequency of given indication reasons for each IV fluid by surgical type.
Basic static variables were chosen most frequently for indications of IV fluid needed for all surgeries except high-risk abdominal surgery where dynamic variables were more frequent. Signs and symptoms of inadequate tissue perfusion were only sparsely indicated. The volume of intraoperative crystalloid fluids was statistically different for patients with hip fracture surgery in cohort 2. Volumes of both colloid and crystalloid fluids were significantly higher for high-risk abdominal surgery in cohort 2.
Nurse anesthetists and nurses in the postanesthesia care unit rely more on basic static parameters than signs of inadequate tissue perfusion when they make decisions about fluid administration. The indications cited for fluid administered to high-risk abdominal surgery and hip fracture patients did not always fit guidelines. This indicates the need of a stronger intervention to change practice to follow evidence-based clinical guidelines.
探讨麻醉护士和麻醉后护理护士在手术期间及麻醉后护理单元进行静脉输液治疗时是否基于证据。其次,调查提供静脉输液指征是否改变了护理实践。
在斯堪的纳维亚进行的一项前瞻性、描述性、单中心研究,比较两个队列。
在两个队列中均获取描述性、液体量和类型数据。队列1(n = 126)用作基线数据。在队列2(n = 130)中,护士使用经过验证的清单记录液体治疗的类型和量的指征。分析比较了各队列中不同手术类型晶体液或胶体液的中位数体积。分析比较了每种静脉输液按手术类型给出的指征原因的频率。
除高风险腹部手术中动态变量更常见外,所有手术中最常选择基本静态变量作为所需静脉输液的指征。组织灌注不足的体征和症状仅很少被提及。队列2中髋部骨折手术患者的术中晶体液量在统计学上有差异。队列2中高风险腹部手术的胶体液和晶体液量均显著更高。
麻醉护士和麻醉后护理单元的护士在做出输液决策时,更多地依赖基本静态参数而非组织灌注不足的体征。给予高风险腹部手术和髋部骨折患者输液的指征并不总是符合指南。这表明需要更强有力的干预措施来改变实践以遵循循证临床指南。