University of Applied Sciences Emden/Leer, Constantiaplatz 4, 26723, Emden, Germany.
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.024. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
Health literacy has become a hot topic in health research and public health promotion. Most definitions specify health literacy as an individual cognitive skill, and surveys such as the EU-HLS which ask people to self-rate their decision-making capacity in the health system, grade a majority of the population as having an inadequate health literacy. Inspired by a praxeological understanding of knowledge and based on an empirical study on welfare bricolage in superdiverse urban neighborhoods, this paper explores health literacy ethnographically and highlights people's knowledge, creative practices and experiences concerning health and healthcare. It draws on 42 semi-structured interviews conducted with a highly diverse sample of residents in Bremen, Germany, between September 2015 and April 2017. The interviews were analyzed with the help of collaborative systematic thematic analysis. The findings question the individualistic and rationalistic bias of conventional approaches to health literacy and suggest that health literacy as a social practice is situational, multidimensional - comprised of different sources and forms of knowledge - and co-produced in social relations. This reformulation of the concept suggests that future research on health literacy should adopt a resource-oriented approach and embrace the rich variety of health knowledge practices.
健康素养已成为健康研究和公共卫生促进的热门话题。大多数定义将健康素养指定为个体认知技能,而像欧盟健康素养调查(EU-HLS)这样的调查则要求人们自我评估其在卫生系统中的决策能力,调查结果显示,大多数人健康素养不足。本文受实践知识理解的启发,并基于对超多元城市社区福利杂耍的实证研究,从民族志角度探讨健康素养,并强调人们对健康和医疗保健的知识、创造性实践和经验。它借鉴了 2015 年 9 月至 2017 年 4 月期间在德国不来梅对高度多样化的居民进行的 42 次半结构化访谈。在协作系统主题分析的帮助下对访谈进行了分析。研究结果对传统健康素养方法的个人主义和理性主义偏见提出了质疑,并表明作为一种社会实践的健康素养是情境的、多维的——由不同的知识来源和形式组成——并在社会关系中共同产生。这一概念的重新表述表明,未来的健康素养研究应采用资源导向的方法,并接受丰富多样的健康知识实践。