[Clinical outcomes with cruciate-substituting ultra-congruent and posterior stabilized in total knee arthroplasty].

To investigate clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty with ultra-congruent insert(UC) or posterior stability insert (PS). A retrospective study was performed on 97 patients (17 males, 80 females, 119 knees) with knee osteoarthritis who received total knee arthroplasty. Of the patients, 42 cases (50 knees) received UC protheses and 55 cases (69 knees) received PS protheses in total knee arthroplasty by the same surgeon in Peking University Third Hospital from March 2015 to November 2015. The data including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), range of motion (ROM), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index and Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score (HSS) before and after the surgery were collected and compared in the two groups. The data were compared between the two groups by single-sample test. There was no significant differences in age, gender, BMI, ROM, HHS and WOMAC scores between the two groups before operation(all 0.05). At 3 months and 2 years of follow-up, ROM, HSS and WOMAC scores were significantly improved in the two groups(all 0.05), but there was no statistical difference between the two groups(-0.303, -1.593, -0.500, all 0.05). One patient with PS prosthesis recieved revision surgery due to prothesis loosening; and no complication found in the UC group(χ(2)=0.731, 0.05). There is no obvious difference between PS and UC in TKA, UC insert seems to be a practical alternative to the PS.