• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推荐或拒绝“酒窝”:WPATH 相关医学专业人员对跨性别女性性别确认性外阴成形术的经验和态度。

Recommending or Rejecting "the Dimple": WPATH-Affiliated Medical Professionals' Experiences and Attitudes Toward Gender-Confirming Vulvoplasty in Transgender Women.

机构信息

Southern California Transgender Counseling, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Southern California Transgender Counseling, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Sex Med. 2019 Apr;16(4):586-595. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.01.316. Epub 2019 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.01.316
PMID:30833148
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Rising numbers of trans women are undergoing genital surgeries, such as vulvoplasty or vulvovaginoplasty, to create a neovagina. Medical professionals who adhere to the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) Standards of Care, Version 7, and who recommend or perform these procedures, are expected to balance best practices with patient preferences, specifically the decision to create or omit the vaginal canal. Due to a paucity of literature on gender-confirming vulvoplasty (GCV) in trans women, there has been no documentation of factors that prompt practitioners to reject or recommend the procedure.

AIM

The aim of the study was to provide descriptive data of WPATH-affiliated medical professionals' knowledge, experiences, and attitudes toward GCV; surgical risks, benefits, and any considerations when referring transgender women 18-21 years of age for this procedure.

METHODS

Purposive sampling of all physicians, surgeons, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and registered nurses listed in the WPATH membership directory was initiated via invitational e-mails. The 32-item survey focused on demographics, medical practices, surgical techniques, and reasons for recommending or rejecting the procedure. Data analysis included frequencies and Pearson's χ test.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Key outcome measures included frequency of cases performed; reasons for recommending, rejecting, or performing GCV; and differences in attitudes toward the procedure among various medical professionals.

RESULTS

N = 198 (20.7%) of 956 solicited professionals completed the survey. Surgeons (n = 61) comprised 30.8% of the total sample. 46 surgeons (76.7%) reported having performed vulvovaginoplasty, and 25 (41.7%) had performed GCV. "Patient request" was the most common reason for recommending or performing GCV. Surgeons were more likely to either agree and perform (30.4%), or reject (32.1%) GCV in a patient aged 18-21 than other practitioners, who were more likely to be "unsure" (68.5%). These differences were statistically significant (χ = 16.467 [2]; n = 193; P < .001).

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The data identify a lack of standardized terminology and surgical techniques concerning GCV.

STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS: This is the first exploratory study to assess medical practitioner experiences and attitudes toward a seldom documented procedure. A larger, more inclusive sample would increase the statistical strength and representative aspect of the study.

CONCLUSION

The study shows divergence in attitudes and knowledge among medical practitioners who recommend or perform GCV, and uncertainty when the patient is 18-21 years old. The study contributes to an expanded description and specific indications of performing GCV in the updated WPATH SOC Version 8. Milrod C, Monto M, Karasic DH. Recommending or Rejecting "the Dimple": WPATH-Affiliated Medical Professionals' Experiences and Attitudes Toward Gender-Confirming Vulvoplasty in Transgender Women. J Sex Med 2019;16:586-595.

摘要

简介

越来越多的跨性别女性接受生殖器手术,如外阴成形术或阴道成形术,以创建新阴道。遵守世界跨性别健康专业协会(WPATH)第七版护理标准,并推荐或进行这些手术的医疗专业人员,预计将在最佳实践和患者偏好之间取得平衡,特别是是否创建阴道的决定。由于跨性别女性性别肯定性外阴成形术(GCV)的文献很少,因此没有记录促使从业者拒绝或推荐该手术的因素。

目的

本研究旨在提供 WPATH 相关医疗专业人员对 GCV 的知识、经验和态度的描述性数据;手术风险、益处,以及当推荐 18-21 岁的跨性别女性接受该手术时的任何考虑因素。

方法

通过邀请电子邮件,对 WPATH 会员目录中列出的所有医生、外科医生、护士从业者、医师助理和注册护士进行了有针对性的抽样。32 项调查重点是人口统计学、医疗实践、手术技术以及推荐或拒绝该手术的原因。数据分析包括频率和 Pearson χ 检验。

主要观察指标

主要观察指标包括手术次数;推荐、拒绝或进行 GCV 的原因;以及不同医疗专业人员对该手术的态度差异。

结果

在邀请的 956 名专业人员中,有 198 名(20.7%)完成了调查。外科医生(n=61)占总样本的 30.8%。46 名外科医生(76.7%)报告曾进行过阴道成形术,25 名(41.7%)进行过 GCV。“患者要求”是推荐或进行 GCV 的最常见原因。与其他从业者相比,外科医生更有可能同意并进行(30.4%)或拒绝(32.1%)年龄在 18-21 岁的患者的 GCV,而其他从业者更有可能持“不确定”态度(68.5%)。这些差异具有统计学意义(χ=16.467[2];n=193;P<0.001)。

临床意义

数据确定了 GCV 方面缺乏标准化的术语和手术技术。

局限性

这是第一项评估医疗从业者对很少有文献记录的手术的经验和态度的探索性研究。更大、更具包容性的样本将提高研究的统计学强度和代表性。

结论

该研究表明,推荐或进行 GCV 的医疗从业者之间存在态度和知识差异,并且当患者年龄在 18-21 岁时存在不确定性。该研究为 WPATH 第 8 版护理标准更新中 GCV 的具体描述和特定适应症提供了参考。Milrod C, Monto M, Karasic DH. Recommending or Rejecting "the Dimple": WPATH-Affiliated Medical Professionals' Experiences and Attitudes Toward Gender-Confirming Vulvoplasty in Transgender Women. J Sex Med 2019;16:586-595.

相似文献

1
Recommending or Rejecting "the Dimple": WPATH-Affiliated Medical Professionals' Experiences and Attitudes Toward Gender-Confirming Vulvoplasty in Transgender Women.推荐或拒绝“酒窝”:WPATH 相关医学专业人员对跨性别女性性别确认性外阴成形术的经验和态度。
J Sex Med. 2019 Apr;16(4):586-595. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.01.316. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
2
Age Is Just a Number: WPATH-Affiliated Surgeons' Experiences and Attitudes Toward Vaginoplasty in Transgender Females Under 18 Years of Age in the United States.年龄只是一个数字:美国与世界跨性别健康专业协会(WPATH)相关的外科医生对18岁以下跨性别女性阴道成形术的经验和态度。
J Sex Med. 2017 Apr;14(4):624-634. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
3
Does Depth Matter? Factors Affecting Choice of Vulvoplasty Over Vaginoplasty as Gender-Affirming Genital Surgery for Transgender Women.深度是否重要?影响跨性别女性性别肯定性生殖器手术中选择阴阜成形术而非阴道成形术的因素。
J Sex Med. 2018 Jun;15(6):902-906. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.03.085. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
4
Gender-Confirming Vulvoplasty in Transgender Women in the Netherlands: Incidence, Motivation Analysis, and Surgical Outcomes.荷兰跨性别女性的性别确认性外阴成形术:发生率、动机分析和手术结果。
J Sex Med. 2020 Aug;17(8):1566-1573. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 May 17.
5
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in the Orthopaedic Care of Sexual and Gender Minority Youth: A Survey of Two Pediatric Academic Hospitals.知识、态度和实践:小儿矫形护理中的性与性别少数青年——两所儿科医院的调查。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jul 1;480(7):1313-1328. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002143. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
6
Requirement of mental health referral letters for staged and revision genital gender-affirming surgeries: An unsanctioned barrier to care.精神健康转诊信对分期和修正生殖器性别肯定手术的要求:未经批准的护理障碍。
Andrology. 2021 Nov;9(6):1765-1772. doi: 10.1111/andr.13028. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
7
Multidisciplinary Care and the Standards of Care for Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Individuals.跨性别者和性别不一致者的多学科护理与护理标准
Clin Plast Surg. 2018 Jul;45(3):295-299. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2018.03.016.
8
Genital gender-affirming surgery for transgender women.为跨性别女性实施的生殖器性别确认手术。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Feb;86:102297. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.102297. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
9
How young is too young: ethical concerns in genital surgery of the transgender MTF adolescent.年龄太小是否合适:跨性别女性青少年生殖器手术中的伦理问题。
J Sex Med. 2014 Feb;11(2):338-46. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12387. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
10
Genders and Individual Treatment Progress in (Non-)Binary Trans Individuals.跨性别者(非二元性别)中的性别认同和个体治疗进展。
J Sex Med. 2018 Jan;15(1):102-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Principles and outcomes of gender-affirming vaginoplasty.性别肯定性阴道成形术的原则和结果。
Nat Rev Urol. 2023 May;20(5):308-322. doi: 10.1038/s41585-022-00705-y. Epub 2023 Feb 1.