Suppr超能文献

细菌人工染色体微珠与核型检测联合应用可改善产前诊断。

Combined use of bacterial artificial chromosomes-on-beads with karyotype detection improves prenatal diagnosis.

作者信息

Miao Zhengyou, Liu Xia, Hu Furong, Zhang Ming, Yang Pingli, Wang Luming

机构信息

1Center of Prenatal Diagnosis, The Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated to Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, 314050 Zhejiang Province People's Republic of China.

2Center Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, 314001 Zhejiang Province People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Mol Cytogenet. 2019 Feb 22;12:9. doi: 10.1186/s13039-019-0416-6. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the individual and combined diagnostic performance of the bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs)-on-Beads (BoBs™) assay and conventional karyotyping for the prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities in pregnant women who were 35 or more years-old.

METHOD

The primary outcome was concordance of any numerical, structural, or submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities between BoBs™ and conventional karyotyping of amniotic fluid specimens from pregnant women at 17 to 22 weeks gestation.

RESULTS

We examined samples from 4852 pregnant women. BoBs™ indicated that 4708 samples were normal (97.03%), and 144 were abnormal (2.97%); conventional karyotyping indicated that 4656 (95.96%) samples were normal and 196 (4.04%) were abnormal. The combined use of both methods indicated that 4633 of 4852 samples were normal (95.49%) and 219 of 4852 samples (4.51%) were abnormal. The kappa coefficient of the combined test was 0.70, indicating substantial consistency between BoBs™ and conventional karyotyping (95% CI = 0.65-0.76,  < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the combined use of BoBs™ and conventional karyotyping detected more fetal abnormalities than either test alone.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了孕珠上细菌人工染色体(BAC)检测法(BoBs™检测法)与传统核型分析技术对35岁及以上孕妇产前染色体异常的单独及联合诊断效能。

方法

主要观察指标是对孕17至22周孕妇羊水标本进行BoBs™检测法和传统核型分析时,在任何数目、结构或亚微观染色体异常方面的一致性。

结果

我们检测了4852例孕妇的样本。BoBs™检测法显示,4708例样本正常(97.03%),144例异常(2.97%);传统核型分析显示,4656例(95.96%)样本正常,196例(4.04%)异常。两种方法联合使用显示,4852例样本中有4633例正常(95.49%),4852例样本中有219例(4.51%)异常。联合检测的kappa系数为0.70,表明BoBs™检测法与传统核型分析之间具有高度一致性(95%CI = 0.65 - 0.76,P < 0.001)。

结论

我们的结果表明,BoBs™检测法与传统核型分析联合使用比单独使用任何一种检测方法能检测出更多胎儿异常情况。

相似文献

1
Combined use of bacterial artificial chromosomes-on-beads with karyotype detection improves prenatal diagnosis.
Mol Cytogenet. 2019 Feb 22;12:9. doi: 10.1186/s13039-019-0416-6. eCollection 2019.
2
BACs-on-Beads™ assay, a rapid aneuploidy test, improves the diagnostic yield of conventional karyotyping.
Mol Biol Rep. 2020 Jan;47(1):169-177. doi: 10.1007/s11033-019-05117-7. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
4
Prenatal diagnosis of BACs-on-Beads assay in 1520 cases from Fujian Province, China.
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020 Oct;8(10):e1446. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1446. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
6
The detection of mosaicism by prenatal BoBs™.
Prenat Diagn. 2013 Jan;33(1):42-9. doi: 10.1002/pd.4006. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
7
Rapid aneusomy detection in products of conception using the KaryoLite™ BACs-on-Beads™ assay.
Prenat Diagn. 2013 Jan;33(1):25-31. doi: 10.1002/pd.4003. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
10
[Application for prenatal diagnosis using both chromosomal karyotype analysis and BACs-on-Beads assay].
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Jun 10;35(3):357-360. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2018.03.011.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Utility of the Prenatal BACs-on-Beads™ Assay in Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis.
Front Genet. 2022 Jan 14;12:789625. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.789625. eCollection 2021.
2

本文引用的文献

1
Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy and single gene disorders.
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Jul;42:26-38. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
2
Recent advances in prenatal genetic screening and testing.
F1000Res. 2016 Oct 28;5:2591. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9215.1. eCollection 2016.
3
A multicenter study of fetal chromosomal abnormalities in Chinese women of advanced maternal age.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;55(3):379-84. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.01.002.
4
Genetic Counseling for Patients Considering Screening and Diagnosis for Chromosomal Abnormalities.
Clin Lab Med. 2016 Jun;36(2):227-36. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
5
Maternal Plasma DNA and RNA Sequencing for Prenatal Testing.
Adv Clin Chem. 2016;74:63-102. doi: 10.1016/bs.acc.2015.12.004. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
6
Screening for fetal aneuploidy.
Semin Perinatol. 2016 Feb;40(1):35-43. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Dec 25.
7
A French multicenter study of over 700 patients with 22q11 deletions diagnosed using FISH or aCGH.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Jun;24(6):844-51. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.219. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
9
Prevalence of recurrent pathogenic microdeletions and microduplications in over 9500 pregnancies.
Prenat Diagn. 2015 Aug;35(8):801-9. doi: 10.1002/pd.4613. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
10
Diagnostic utility of microarray testing in pregnancy loss.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;46(4):478-86. doi: 10.1002/uog.14866. Epub 2015 Sep 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验