Suppr超能文献

与单纯体外放射治疗(EBRT)相比,接受高剂量率近距离放射治疗辅助EBRT的前列腺癌患者生存率提高。

Improved survival for patients with prostate cancer receiving high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost to EBRT compared with EBRT alone.

作者信息

Kent Aaron R, Matheson Bronwyn, Millar Jeremy L

机构信息

Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, The Alfred Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Brachytherapy. 2019 May-Jun;18(3):313-321. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Mar 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost is a treatment of intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer, but long-term clinical outcome data are sparse. We report long-term survival and toxicity data in a cohort of patients treated in a single institution.

METHODS

Between 1998 and 2004, 654 patients with localized prostate cancer received either 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (median 46 Gy) with an HDR (median 18 Gy in three fractions) boost ("3-D conformal radiotherapy [3DCRT] + HDR"; 215 patients) or 3DCRT alone ("3DCRT"; median 70 Gy; 439 patients) with curative intent. Men with National Comprehensive Cancer Network intermediate risk were offered neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and with high risk were also offered adjuvant androgen deprivation. Data collection included patient-reported outcome measures.

RESULTS

The 3DCRT + HDR group was older (72.3 vs. 68.9 yrs), had higher presenting PSAs (iPSA) (15.66 and 12.57 ng/mL, respectively), higher proportion of Gleason scores >7 (15.3% vs. 12.4%), and higher proportions of extracapsular disease (29.3% vs. 25.5%). 3DCRT + HDR men had lower proportions of low-risk patients (3.3% vs. 19.4%) and higher proportions of high-risk patients (50.7% vs. 37.4%) than the 3DCRT group. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year overall survival was superior at 92%, 81%, and 67%, respectively, for the 3DCRT + HDR group, compared with 88%, 71%, and 53%, respectively, in the 3DCRT group (p < 0.001). The 5-, 10-, and 15-year cause specific survival also favored the HDR boost group with survival of 96%, 93%, and 87% (3DCRT + HDR) and 95% 88% and 79% (3DCRT), respectively (p < 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

HDR brachytherapy boost in conjunction with 3DCRT offered superior overall survival and cause-specific survival in our patient population.

摘要

目的

高剂量率(HDR)近距离放疗增敏是治疗中高危前列腺癌的一种方法,但长期临床结局数据较少。我们报告了在单一机构接受治疗的一组患者的长期生存和毒性数据。

方法

1998年至2004年期间,654例局限性前列腺癌患者接受了三维适形放疗(中位剂量46 Gy)联合HDR(分三次,中位剂量18 Gy)增敏(“三维适形放疗[3DCRT]+HDR”;215例患者)或单纯3DCRT(“3DCRT”;中位剂量70 Gy;439例患者),目的是治愈。美国国立综合癌症网络(National Comprehensive Cancer Network)定义的中危男性患者接受新辅助雄激素剥夺治疗,高危男性患者还接受辅助雄激素剥夺治疗。数据收集包括患者报告的结局指标。

结果

接受3DCRT+HDR治疗的患者年龄更大(72.3岁对68.9岁),初始前列腺特异性抗原(iPSA)水平更高(分别为15.66和12.57 ng/mL),Gleason评分>7的比例更高(15.3%对12.4%),包膜外侵犯的比例更高(29.3%对25.5%)。与3DCRT组相比,接受3DCRT+HDR治疗的患者中低危患者比例更低(3.3%对19.4%),高危患者比例更高(50.7%对37.4%)。3DCRT+HDR组的5年、10年和15年总生存率分别为92%、81%和67%,优于3DCRT组分别为88%、71%和53%(p<0.001)。5年、1年和15年的特定病因生存率也有利于HDR增敏组,生存率分别为96%、93%和87%(3DCRT+HDR)以及95%、88%和79%(3DCRT)(p<0.037)。

结论

在我们的患者群体中,HDR近距离放疗增敏联合3DCRT可提供更好的总生存率和特定病因生存率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验