Mabuchi Yasushi, Takiguchi Yoshihiro, Yahata Tamaki, Mizoguchi Mika, Sasaki Noriyuki, Ota Nami, Minami Sawako, Ino Kazuhiko
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wakayama Medical University, School of Medicine, Wakayama, Wakayama 641-0012, Japan.
Mol Clin Oncol. 2019 Mar;10(3):382-386. doi: 10.3892/mco.2019.1806. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
The aim of the present study was to clarify the feasibility and efficacy of helical tomotherapy during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for treating cervical cancer. The medical records of 13 patients who underwent oncurrent chemoradiotherapy using helical tomotherapy for cervical cancer at Wakayama Medical University Hospital between 2013 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 15 patients who underwent oncurrent chemoradiotherapy using conventional radiotherapy (CRT) between 2008 and 2013 at our institution were also examined for comparison. The median age of patients treated with helical tomotherapy was 60 (range, 35-71), and the median age of patients treated with CRT was 57 (range, 43-77). The median follow-up period was 27 months (range, 3-46) in the tomotherapy group and 35 months (range, 7-88) in the CRT group. The frequency of G3/4 thrombocytopenia in the tomotherapy group was significantly higher than that in the CRT group (P=0.049). However, the platelet count spontaneously recovered without transfusion. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of frequency of G3/4 neutropenia, diarrhea or late intestine injury. The rate of complete response in the tomotherapy group and the CRT group was 84.6 and 73.3%, respectively, and there was no significant difference in the response rate between the groups. There were no significant differences in the progression-free survival or progression-free rate in the irradiation field between the groups. Adverse events from concurrent chemoradiotherapy using helical tomotherapy were acceptable and clinically controllable. The present results suggest that helical tomotherapy is efficient during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for treatment of advanced cervical cancer.
本研究的目的是阐明螺旋断层放射治疗在宫颈癌同步放化疗中的可行性和疗效。回顾性分析了2013年至2015年期间在和歌山医科大学医院接受螺旋断层放射治疗同步放化疗的13例宫颈癌患者的病历。还对2008年至2013年期间在我院接受传统放疗(CRT)同步放化疗的15例患者进行了比较研究。接受螺旋断层放射治疗患者的中位年龄为60岁(范围35 - 71岁),接受CRT治疗患者的中位年龄为57岁(范围43 - 77岁)。螺旋断层放射治疗组的中位随访期为27个月(范围3 - 46个月),CRT组为35个月(范围7 - 88个月)。螺旋断层放射治疗组3/4级血小板减少的发生率显著高于CRT组(P = 0.049)。然而,血小板计数可自发恢复,无需输血。两组在3/4级中性粒细胞减少、腹泻或晚期肠道损伤的发生率方面无显著差异。螺旋断层放射治疗组和CRT组的完全缓解率分别为84.6%和73.3%,两组缓解率无显著差异。两组在无进展生存期或照射野内的无进展率方面无显著差异。螺旋断层放射治疗同步放化疗的不良事件是可接受的且临床可控。目前的结果表明,螺旋断层放射治疗在晚期宫颈癌同步放化疗中是有效的。