Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey.
Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2019 May;19(5):409-413. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13633. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
To determine the effect of two neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) periods on quadriceps strength (QS) and functional performance in nursing home residents.
A total of 53 older adults living in a nursing home were randomized into two groups: NMES with a short stimulation period and NMES with a long stimulation period. The quadriceps muscles were bilaterally stimulated three times a week for 6 weeks in both groups. Strength was measured with a digital handheld dynamometer and 30-s chair stand test. Functional performance was evaluated with the Berg balance scale, Timed Up and Go test and 6-min walking test.
Analysis was carried out on 44 older adults, who completed the study protocol. The isometric QS did not change within groups or between groups. Interestingly, the 30-s chair stand test score increased for both groups, but the improvements were similar among groups. The Berg balance scale score, Timed Up and Go test time and 6-min walking test distance also improved in both groups. However, no difference in any of the functional outcome measures was observed between groups.
The present findings showed that both NMES protocols might be an alternative to achieve an improvement in functional strength of the lower extremities and functional performance in nursing home residents, whereas neither of the two protocols seems effective for improving isometric QS. Both methods might contribute to maintaining isometric QS during the aging process. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 409-413.
确定两种神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)时期对养老院居民股四头肌力量(QS)和功能表现的影响。
共有 53 名居住在养老院的老年人随机分为两组:NMES 短刺激期组和 NMES 长刺激期组。两组均每周接受三次双侧股四头肌刺激,持续 6 周。力量使用数字手持测力计和 30 秒坐立测试进行测量。功能表现使用 Berg 平衡量表、计时起立行走测试和 6 分钟步行测试进行评估。
对完成研究方案的 44 名老年人进行了分析。两组的等长 QS 均未发生组内或组间变化。有趣的是,两组的 30 秒坐立测试得分均有所增加,但组间改善情况相似。两组的 Berg 平衡量表评分、计时起立行走测试时间和 6 分钟步行测试距离也均有所改善。然而,两组间任何功能结果测量均无差异。
本研究结果表明,两种 NMES 方案都可能是改善养老院居民下肢功能力量和功能表现的替代方法,而两种方案似乎都不能有效改善等长 QS。两种方法都可能有助于维持老年人的等长 QS。