Yu Chen, Jiang Long-Hai, Cai Da-Wei, Wu Ji, Qin Jian
Department of Orthopaedic, Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, China.
Department of Orthopaedic, Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, China;
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 Feb 25;32(2):120-129. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.02.006.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of proximal femoral nail antirotation(PFNA) vs InterTAN nail in treating the elderly intertrochanteric femoral fractures.
Data of the randomized controlled trials(RCTs) about PFNA vs InterTAN for the treatment of the elderly intertrochanteric femoral fractures were searched in as the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Wanfang, CNKI, CBM and VIP from their establishment to January 2018 for collecting. After study selection, assessment and data extraction conducted by two reviewers independently, meta-analyses were performed by using the RevMan 5.3 sofware. The level of evidence was assessed by using the GRADEpro system.
Twelve studies involving 1 015 patients were included. The results of meta, analyses showed that: (1)safety indicator: compared with the InterTAN, PFNA had shorter operation time, and less intraoperative bleeding. But InterTAN had less total postoperative complications and internal fixation failure, but there was no significant difference in the operative incision lengths, fracture healing time and other postoperative complications. (2)efficacy indicator: compared with the InterTAN, the Harris hip score was lower after 3 months, but Harris hip score had no significant difference between the two groups after 6, 12 months. Based on GRADEpro system, all the evidence was at level C and weak recommendation(2C).
The current evidence indicates that PFNA had a similar effect compared with the InterTAN. But InterTAN could provide better stability against rotation and axial pressure effect, can allow patients do functional exercise early such as ambulation to recovery the hip function. It also had less total postoperative complications and internal fixation failure for the poor quality of the original studies and the limited number of studies, a prudent choice is suggested and more high-quality, large-sample studies are need.
评估股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)与InterTAN髓内钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的疗效及安全性。
检索Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、EMbase、万方、知网、中国生物医学文献数据库和维普数据库中自建库至2018年1月关于PFNA与InterTAN治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的随机对照试验(RCT)数据并进行收集。由两名评价员独立进行研究筛选、评估及数据提取后,采用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。采用GRADEpro系统评估证据等级。
纳入12项研究,共1015例患者。Meta分析结果显示:(1)安全性指标:与InterTAN相比,PFNA手术时间短,术中出血量少。但InterTAN术后总并发症及内固定失败例数少,手术切口长度、骨折愈合时间及其他术后并发症差异无统计学意义。(2)疗效指标:与InterTAN相比,术后3个月Harris髋关节评分较低,但术后6、12个月两组Harris髋关节评分差异无统计学意义。基于GRADEpro系统,所有证据等级为C级,推荐强度为弱推荐(2C)。
现有证据表明,PFNA与InterTAN疗效相似。但InterTAN抗旋转及轴向压力稳定性更好,能使患者早期进行如行走等功能锻炼以恢复髋关节功能。因原始研究质量较差且研究数量有限,其术后总并发症及内固定失败例数也较少,建议谨慎选择,仍需要更多高质量、大样本研究。