Suppr超能文献

支付诱导家庭护理的边际效益是什么?对医疗补助支出和护理接受者健康的影响。

What is the marginal benefit of payment-induced family care? Impact on Medicaid spending and health of care recipients.

机构信息

Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2019 May;28(5):678-692. doi: 10.1002/hec.3873. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

Abstract

Research on home-based long-term care has centered almost solely on the costs; there has been very little, if any, attention paid to the relative benefits. This study exploits the randomization built into the Cash and Counseling Demonstration and Evaluation program that directly impacted the likelihood of having family involved in home care delivery. Randomization in the trial is used as an instrumental variable for family involvement in care, resulting in a causal estimate of the effect of changing the combination of home health-care providers on health-care utilization and health outcomes of the beneficiary. We find that some family involvement in home-based care significantly decreases health-care utilization: lower likelihood of emergency room use, Medicaid-financed inpatient days, any Medicaid hospital expenditures, and fewer months with Medicaid-paid inpatient use. We find that individuals who have some family involved in home-based care are less likely to have several adverse health outcomes within the first 9 months of the trial, including lower prevalence of infections, bedsores, or shortness of breath, suggesting that the lower utilization may be due to better health outcomes.

摘要

家庭长期护理的研究几乎完全集中在成本上;几乎没有(如果有的话)关注相对收益。本研究利用了直接影响家庭参与家庭护理提供可能性的现金和咨询示范和评估计划中的随机化。试验中的随机化被用作家庭参与护理的工具变量,从而对改变家庭保健提供者组合对受益人的医疗保健利用和健康结果的影响进行因果估计。我们发现,家庭参与家庭护理的某些方面显著降低了医疗保健的利用:急诊室使用的可能性降低、医疗补助资助的住院天数、任何医疗补助医院支出以及享受医疗补助付费住院治疗的月数减少。我们发现,在试验的前 9 个月内,有一些家庭成员参与家庭护理的个人不太可能出现几种不良健康结果,包括感染、褥疮或呼吸急促的发病率较低,这表明较低的利用率可能是由于更好的健康结果。

相似文献

2
How does Cash and Counseling affect costs?
Health Serv Res. 2007 Feb;42(1 Pt 2):488-509. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00680.x.
5
Cost savings from home and community-based services: Arizona's capitated Medicaid long-term care program.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1997 Dec;22(6):1329-57. doi: 10.1215/03616878-22-6-1329.
6
The effects of cash and counseling on personal care services and Medicaid costs in Arkansas.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Jul-Dec;Suppl Web Exclusives:W3-566-75. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w3.566.
7
Medicaid Cost Savings of a Preventive Home Visit Program for Disabled Older Adults.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Mar;66(3):614-620. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15143. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
9
Do noninstitutional long-term care services reduce Medicaid spending?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):262-72. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.262.
10
The relative benefits and cost of medicaid home- and community-based services in Florida.
Gerontologist. 2006 Aug;46(4):483-94. doi: 10.1093/geront/46.4.483.

引用本文的文献

1
Home care workforce participation and household co-residence with people with LTSS needs.
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jul 9;3(8):qxaf141. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf141. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Support for Care Economy Policies by Political Affiliation and Caregiving Responsibilities.
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jun 7;6(6):e251204. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1204.
3
Home-Based Care Outcomes: Does the Care Provider Matter?
Health Econ. 2025 Aug;34(8):1487-1506. doi: 10.1002/hec.4972. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
4
Trends in hospital discharge outcomes among high-risk Medicare beneficiaries before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Mar 18;3(4):qxaf056. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf056. eCollection 2025 Apr.
6
Integrating family caregivers in older adults' hospital stays: a needed cultural shift.
Hosp Pract (1995). 2024 May 21:1-13. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2024.2357510.
7
Tracking long-term services and supports rebalancing through workforce data.
Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug;59(4):e14293. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14293. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
8
Developing a comprehensive model of home-based formal care for elderly adults in Iran: A study protocol.
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 8;18(8):e0284462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284462. eCollection 2023.
9
Family spillovers and long-term care insurance.
J Health Econ. 2023 Jul;90:102781. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2023.102781. Epub 2023 Jun 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Informal Caregiving, Employment Status and Work Hours of the 50+ Population in Europe.
Economist (Leiden). 2018;166(3):363-396. doi: 10.1007/s10645-018-9323-1. Epub 2018 May 31.
3
A Comprehensive Measure of the Costs of Caring for a Parent: Differences According to Functional Status.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Oct;66(10):2003-2008. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15552. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
4
The effect of workforce assignment on performance: Evidence from home health care.
J Health Econ. 2018 May;59:26-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
5
Supporting Family Caregivers of Older Americans.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 29;375(26):2513-2515. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1612351.
6
Does home care for dependent elderly people improve their mental health?
J Health Econ. 2016 Jan;45:149-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
7
Are public subsidies effective to reduce emergency care? Evidence from the PLASA study.
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Aug;138:31-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.035. Epub 2015 May 23.
8
Does Formal Employment Reduce Informal Caregiving?
Health Econ. 2016 Jul;25(7):829-43. doi: 10.1002/hec.3185. Epub 2015 May 28.
10
The hidden costs of rebalancing long-term care.
Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun;49(3):771-7. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12190.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验