Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Health Econ. 2019 May;28(5):678-692. doi: 10.1002/hec.3873. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
Research on home-based long-term care has centered almost solely on the costs; there has been very little, if any, attention paid to the relative benefits. This study exploits the randomization built into the Cash and Counseling Demonstration and Evaluation program that directly impacted the likelihood of having family involved in home care delivery. Randomization in the trial is used as an instrumental variable for family involvement in care, resulting in a causal estimate of the effect of changing the combination of home health-care providers on health-care utilization and health outcomes of the beneficiary. We find that some family involvement in home-based care significantly decreases health-care utilization: lower likelihood of emergency room use, Medicaid-financed inpatient days, any Medicaid hospital expenditures, and fewer months with Medicaid-paid inpatient use. We find that individuals who have some family involved in home-based care are less likely to have several adverse health outcomes within the first 9 months of the trial, including lower prevalence of infections, bedsores, or shortness of breath, suggesting that the lower utilization may be due to better health outcomes.
家庭长期护理的研究几乎完全集中在成本上;几乎没有(如果有的话)关注相对收益。本研究利用了直接影响家庭参与家庭护理提供可能性的现金和咨询示范和评估计划中的随机化。试验中的随机化被用作家庭参与护理的工具变量,从而对改变家庭保健提供者组合对受益人的医疗保健利用和健康结果的影响进行因果估计。我们发现,家庭参与家庭护理的某些方面显著降低了医疗保健的利用:急诊室使用的可能性降低、医疗补助资助的住院天数、任何医疗补助医院支出以及享受医疗补助付费住院治疗的月数减少。我们发现,在试验的前 9 个月内,有一些家庭成员参与家庭护理的个人不太可能出现几种不良健康结果,包括感染、褥疮或呼吸急促的发病率较低,这表明较低的利用率可能是由于更好的健康结果。