Department of Anthropology, University of Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Fluorescence Microscopy and Cell Imaging Shared Resource, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2019 Jun;169(2):207-226. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.23815. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
The current study seeks to determine if a sample of foragers, farmers, and pastoralists are distinguishable based on their dental microwear texture signatures.
The study included a sample of 719 individuals from 51 archeological sites (450 farmers, 192 foragers, 77 pastoralists). All were over age 12 and sexes were pooled. Using a Sensofar® white-light confocal profiler we collected dental microwear texture analysis (DMTA) data from a single first or second molar from each individual. We leveled and cleaned data clouds following standard procedures and analyzed the data with Sfrax® and Toothfrax® software. The DMTA variables were complexity and anisotropy. Statistics included ANOVA with partial eta squared and Hedges's g. We also performed a follow-up K-means cluster analysis.
We found significant differences between foragers and farmers and pastoralists for complexity and anisotropy, with foragers having greater complexity than either the farmers or the pastoralists. The farmers and pastoralists had greater anisotropy than the foragers. The Old World foragers had significantly higher anisotropy values than New World foragers. Old and New World farmers did not differ. Among the Old World farmers, those dating from the Neolithic through the Late Bronze Age had higher complexity values than those from the Iron Age through the medieval period. The cluster analysis discerned foragers and farmers but also indicated similarity between hard food foragers and hard food farmers.
Our findings reaffirm that DMTA is capable of distinguishing human diets. We found that foragers and farmers, in particular, differ in their microwear signatures across the globe. There are some exceptions, but nothing that would be unexpected given the range of human diets and food preparation techniques. This study indicates that in general DMTA is an efficacious means of paleodietary reconstruction in humans.
本研究旨在确定采集者、农民和牧民是否可以根据其牙齿微观磨损纹理特征来区分。
该研究包括来自 51 个考古遗址的 719 个人的样本(450 名农民、192 名采集者、77 名牧民)。所有参与者年龄均超过 12 岁,且男女均有。我们使用 Sensofar®白光共聚焦轮廓仪从每个个体的单个第一或第二臼齿收集牙齿微观磨损纹理分析(DMTA)数据。我们按照标准程序对数据云进行了水平和清洁,并使用 Sfrax®和 Toothfrax®软件分析了数据。DMTA 变量包括复杂性和各向异性。统计分析包括具有偏 eta 平方和 Hedges'g 的方差分析。我们还进行了后续的 K-均值聚类分析。
我们发现采集者和农民以及牧民之间在复杂性和各向异性方面存在显著差异,采集者的复杂性大于农民或牧民。农民和牧民的各向异性大于采集者。旧大陆的采集者的各向异性值明显高于新大陆的采集者。旧大陆和新大陆的农民之间没有差异。在旧大陆的农民中,新石器时代到青铜时代晚期的农民的复杂性值高于铁器时代到中世纪的农民。聚类分析能够区分采集者和农民,并且还表明硬食采集者和硬食农民之间存在相似性。
我们的研究结果再次证实,DMTA 能够区分人类饮食。我们发现,尤其是采集者和农民,在全球范围内,他们的微观磨损特征存在差异。但是,考虑到人类饮食和食物准备技术的范围,这些差异在预期之中。本研究表明,总体而言,DMTA 是人类古食谱重建的有效方法。