The Johns Hopkins Medicine Simulation Center, The Johns Hopkins University, Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Division of Pediatric Respiratory Care Services, Baltimore, Maryland.
Respir Care. 2019 Jul;64(7):801-808. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06369. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
All health-care providers who care for infants and children should be able to effectively provide ventilation with a bag and a mask. Respiratory therapists (RTs'), as part of rapid response teams, need to quickly identify the need for airway support and use adjunct airway interventions when subjects are difficult to mask ventilate. Before implementation of an educational curriculum for airway management, we assessed whether pediatric RTs' who enter the room of a simulated infant mannequin in severe respiratory distress are able to apply bag-mask ventilation within 60 s and implement 2 adjunct airway maneuvers in a patient who is difficult to ventilate.
All pediatric RTs' were required to attend one high-fidelity simulation at the Johns Hopkins Medicine Simulation Center. The sessions were reviewed to evaluate whether the therapists would implement adjunct maneuvers to a patient who was in respiratory distress and was difficult to ventilate.
Twenty-eight therapists participated in the baseline skills assessment session, and 26 (72% of eligible therapists) were evaluable with video clips. Only 3 of 26 (12%) attempted bag-mask ventilation within 60 s. Although all the therapists attempted one airway maneuver, only 65% were able to implement ≥2 airway maneuvers and achieve effective ventilation, with a wide range of time (98-298 s). There was no pattern regarding which intervention was implemented first, second, and so forth.
Our team of pediatric RTs' did not share a standard mental model for initiating bag-mask ventilation during impending respiratory failure or implementing airway adjuncts. This may place children who are critically ill at risk of suboptimal management and threaten clinical outcomes. Therapist performance indicated that no established care algorithm had been effectively implemented or that skill retention was poor. A change in the content and delivery method of bag-mask ventilation training is warranted to improve the time to performance of key interventions and to establish a clear cognitive framework of difficult mask ventilation management.
所有照顾婴儿和儿童的医疗保健提供者都应该能够有效地使用口罩和面罩进行通气。呼吸治疗师(RTs)作为快速反应团队的一部分,需要快速识别气道支持的需求,并在患者难以进行面罩通气时使用辅助气道干预措施。在实施气道管理教育课程之前,我们评估了进入严重呼吸窘迫模拟婴儿模型房间的儿科 RTs 是否能够在 60 秒内进行面罩通气,并在难以通气的患者中实施 2 种辅助气道操作。
所有儿科 RTs 都需要参加约翰霍普金斯医学模拟中心的一次高保真模拟。对这些课程进行了回顾性评估,以评估治疗师是否会对呼吸窘迫且难以通气的患者实施辅助操作。
28 名治疗师参加了基线技能评估课程,其中 26 名(合格治疗师的 72%)有视频片段可评估。只有 26 名中的 3 名(12%)在 60 秒内尝试了面罩通气。尽管所有治疗师都尝试了一种气道操作,但只有 65%能够实施≥2 种气道操作并实现有效通气,时间范围很广(98-298 秒)。没有哪种干预措施先实施、第二个实施等的模式。
我们的儿科 RTs 团队在即将发生呼吸衰竭时启动面罩通气或实施气道辅助措施时,没有共同的思维模式。这可能使病情危急的儿童面临治疗管理不理想和威胁临床结局的风险。治疗师的表现表明,尚未有效实施既定的护理算法,或者技能保留较差。需要改变面罩通气培训的内容和交付方式,以提高关键干预措施的执行时间,并建立明确的困难面罩通气管理认知框架。