Fu Pei P, Li Wen X, Zou Hong, Zhang Dong, Wu Shan G, Li Ming, Wang Gui T, Xi Bing W
Key Laboratory of Aquaculture Disease Control, Ministry of Agriculture, and State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072, People's Republic of China.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, People's Republic of China.
Syst Parasitol. 2019 Apr;96(3):327-335. doi: 10.1007/s11230-019-09849-9. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
Owing to the brief and incomplete original description of Gangesia pseudobagrae Chen, 1962 (Cestoda: Onchoproteocephalidea) and high morphological similarity to Gangesia oligonchis Roitman & Freze, 1964 parasitising the same host Tachysurus fulvidraco Richardson, the taxonomic validity of G. pseudobagrae in China remains questionable. Therefore, we sampled and identified specimens of Gangesia Woodland, 1924 from the intestine of T. fulvidraco from three lakes in central China. Morphologically, the sampled specimens almost perfectly corresponded both to G. oligonchis and the limited available description of G. pseudobagrae: rostellum-like organ armed with a single complete circle of hooks (24-31 in number); four uniloculate suckers covered with minute hooklets; genital pore irregularly alternated; testes medullary, spherical to oval; ovary medullary, bi-lobed, follicular; cirrus-sac thick-walled and long; uterus medullary. 28S rDNA sequence also exhibited the highest similarity to G. oligonchis (99.4-99.7%). Phylogenetic analysis showed that 11 individuals of Gangesia from the three lakes in China clustered with G. oligonchis from Russia (no sequence of G. pseudobagrae available on GenBank). Based upon the high similarity of morphology and high similarity of 28S rDNA sequences, the specimens of Gangesia from T. fulvidraco in central China were identified as G. oligonchis. Our results indicate that there is only one species of Gangesia in T. fulvidraco from the Palaearctic region, and thereby support the proposed synonymisation of G. pseudobagrae and G. oligonchis.
由于1962年陈(绦虫纲:钩绦虫目)对拟巴氏恒河绦虫(Gangesia pseudobagrae)的原始描述简短且不完整,并且与1964年寄生于同一宿主黄颡鱼(Tachysurus fulvidraco Richardson)的少钩恒河绦虫(Gangesia oligonchis Roitman & Freze)形态高度相似,因此在中国拟巴氏恒河绦虫的分类有效性仍存疑问。所以,我们从中国中部三个湖泊的黄颡鱼肠道中采集并鉴定了1924年伍德兰(Woodland)描述的恒河绦虫(Gangesia)标本。形态学上,所采集的标本几乎与少钩恒河绦虫以及拟巴氏恒河绦虫有限的现有描述完全相符:具顶突状器官,其上有一圈完整的小钩(数量为24 - 31个);四个单腔吸盘,表面布满微小的小钩;生殖孔不规则交替排列;睾丸位于髓质,球形至椭圆形;卵巢位于髓质,分两叶,呈滤泡状;阴茎囊壁厚且长;子宫位于髓质。28S rDNA序列也显示出与少钩恒河绦虫具有最高的相似性(99.4 - 99.7%)。系统发育分析表明,来自中国三个湖泊的11个恒河绦虫个体与来自俄罗斯的少钩恒河绦虫聚类在一起(GenBank上没有拟巴氏恒河绦虫的序列)。基于形态学的高度相似性和28S rDNA序列的高度相似性,将中国中部黄颡鱼体内的恒河绦虫标本鉴定为少钩恒河绦虫。我们的结果表明,在古北区的黄颡鱼中只有一种恒河绦虫,从而支持了拟巴氏恒河绦虫和少钩恒河绦虫同义化的提议。