Suppr超能文献

一个全面的牙周治疗项目:牙周状况、依从率和风险因素。

A comprehensive periodontal treatment project: The periodontal status, compliance rates, and risk factors.

作者信息

Huang Kuo-Ching, Lai Chao-Han, Huang Chiung-Fang, Lu Hsein-Kun

机构信息

Dental Department, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.

Periodontal Department, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Dent Sci. 2016 Jun;11(2):182-188. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Nov 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The comprehensive periodontal treatment project (CPTP) is being implemented in Taiwan since 2010. This retrospective study compared the periodontal status, compliance rates, and influence of risk factors for periodontal recurrence and tooth loss among groups of patients who accepted CPTP and conventional periodontal treatment (CPT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 161 patients who received periodontal therapy were investigated and divided into compliant ( = 94) and noncompliant ( = 67) groups. Patients in the compliant group were further assigned to two subgroups: CPT with a postcard recall (PR) system (CPT + PR,  = 48) and CPTP with a PR system (CPTP + PR,  = 46). Demographic characteristics and periodontal parameters, including the probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP), and plaque control record (PCR), were collected for comparison between the subgroups. The risk factors for periodontal recurrence and tooth loss were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

The 161 patients were followed-up for a mean of 3.8 years. The patients in the CPTP + PR subgroup exhibited shallower PPD, less BOP, improved PCR, and fewer tooth loss. Age, smoking, PPD ≥7 mm, and PCR ≥30% were associated with periodontal recurrence, whereas age, diabetes, BOP ≥30%, and duration of the follow-up period were correlated with tooth loss. PR apparently increased the compliance rate of patients (27.3% vs. 77.7%).

CONCLUSION

CPTP with PR led to an optimal and stable periodontal status in patients. Compliant patients maintained a significantly improved periodontal status as compared with noncompliant patients.

摘要

背景/目的:自2010年起,台湾地区开始实施综合牙周治疗项目(CPTP)。本回顾性研究比较了接受CPTP和传统牙周治疗(CPT)的患者组之间的牙周状况、依从率以及牙周复发和牙齿缺失风险因素的影响。

材料与方法

共调查了161例接受牙周治疗的患者,并将其分为依从组(n = 94)和不依从组(n = 67)。依从组患者进一步分为两个亚组:采用明信片召回(PR)系统的CPT(CPT + PR,n = 48)和采用PR系统的CPTP(CPTP + PR,n = 46)。收集人口统计学特征和牙周参数,包括探诊深度(PPD)、探诊出血(BOP)和菌斑控制记录(PCR),用于亚组间比较。对牙周复发和牙齿缺失的风险因素进行统计学分析。

结果

161例患者平均随访3.8年。CPTP + PR亚组患者的PPD较浅、BOP较少、PCR改善且牙齿缺失较少。年龄、吸烟、PPD≥7 mm和PCR≥30%与牙周复发相关,而年龄、糖尿病、BOP≥30%和随访期与牙齿缺失相关。PR明显提高了患者的依从率(27.3%对77.7%)。

结论

CPTP联合PR可使患者获得最佳且稳定的牙周状况。与不依从患者相比,依从患者的牙周状况有显著改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07e5/6395145/b2e2c8d467d9/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验