a Department of Exercise and Health Science , National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences , Taipei , Taiwan.
b School of Sport, Exercise and Nutrition , Massey University , Palmerston North , New Zealand.
J Sports Sci. 2019 Aug;37(16):1805-1815. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1595338. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
The purpose of this study was to examine CHO ingestion on a cognitive task using a field-simulated time-trial (TT) under hypoxia in well-trained triathletes. Ten male triathletes (age: 22.1 ± 1.1 years; VOmax: 59.4 ± 1.4 ml/kg/min) participated in this double-blind/crossover/counter-balanced design study. Participants completed 3 TT trials: 1) normoxic placebo (NPLA; FiO = 20.9%), 2) hypoxic placebo (HPLA; FiO = 16.3%), and 3) hypoxic CHO (HCHO; 6% CHO provided as 2 ml/kg/15 min; FiO = 16.3%). During the TT, physiological responses (SpO, HR, RPE, and blood glucose/lactate), cognitive performance, and cerebral haemodynamics were measured. Hypoxia reduced TT performance by ~3.5-4% (), but CHO did not affect TT performance under hypoxia. For the cognitive task, CHO slightly preserved exercise-induced cognitive reaction speed but did not affect response accuracy during hypoxic exercise. However, CHO did not preserve the decreased Hb-Diff (cerebral blood flow, CBF) and increased HHb in the prefrontal lobe () during hypoxic exercise, and CHO failed to preserve hypoxia-suppressed prefrontal CBF and tissue oxygen saturation. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that CHO is effective in sustaining reaction speed for a cognitive task but not promoting TT performance during hypoxic exercise, which would be important for strategy-/decision-making when athletes compete at moderate high-altitude.
本研究的目的是在训练有素的铁人三项运动员中,在模拟野外的时间试验(TT)下,研究缺氧条件下 CHO 摄入对认知任务的影响。10 名男性铁人三项运动员(年龄:22.1 ± 1.1 岁;最大摄氧量:59.4 ± 1.4 ml/kg/min)参与了这项双盲/交叉/平衡设计研究。参与者完成了 3 次 TT 试验:1)常氧安慰剂(NPLA;FiO = 20.9%),2)低氧安慰剂(HPLA;FiO = 16.3%)和 3)低氧 CHO(HCHO;6% CHO 以 2 ml/kg/15 min 提供;FiO = 16.3%)。在 TT 期间,测量了生理反应(SpO、HR、RPE 和血糖/乳酸)、认知表现和脑血流动力学。低氧降低 TT 表现约 3.5-4%(),但 CHO 并未影响低氧下的 TT 表现。对于认知任务,CHO 略微保持了运动引起的认知反应速度,但在低氧运动期间没有影响反应准确性。然而,CHO 并没有保持低氧运动时前额叶中 Hb-Diff(脑血流,CBF)的降低和 HHb 的增加(),也没有保持低氧抑制的前额叶 CBF 和组织氧饱和度。总之,本研究表明,CHO 有效维持认知任务的反应速度,但不能在低氧运动中提高 TT 表现,这对于运动员在中高海拔比赛时的策略/决策非常重要。