School of Dentistry, University of Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
School of Dentistry, University of Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019 Jun;26:137-141. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.03.013. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of final irrigation protocols and endodontic sealer on bond strength of root filling material on root dentin previously treated with photodynamic therapy (PDT).
One hundred root canals were prepared up to #F3 file of Pro-Taper system to receive the root filling material. All samples were submitted to PDT and randomly divided into five groups (n = 20) according to final irrigation protocols: Group 1-distilled water + ultrasonic activation (US); Group 2-17% EDTA; Group 3-QMix; Group 4-17% EDTA + US; Group 5-QMix + US. Each group was randomly divided into two subgroups (n = 10), according to the endodontic sealer used for cementation of gutta-percha points: AH Plus or MTA Fillapex. The bond strength was evaluated by a push-out test. The patterns of failure were observed under optical microscopy. The bond strength was evaluated using a two-way Anova followed by the Tukey post-hoc test, and the failure mode was evaluated using the chi-square test (α = 5%).
The use of 17% EDTA and QMix associated or not to US improved the bond strength of root filling material with either endodontic sealer (p < 0.05). AH Plus showed higher bond strength than MTA Fillapex (p < 0.05). There was a higher predominance of cohesive failure in all groups, regardless of the tested final irrigation protocols and endodontic sealer (p < 0.05).
The use of 17% EDTA and QMix, regardless of association with US, and the use of AH Plus improve the bond strength of the root filling material on root dentin previously treated with PDT.
本研究旨在评估最终冲洗方案和根管封闭剂对先前接受光动力疗法(PDT)治疗的根管牙本质上根管填充物的粘结强度的影响。
将 100 个根管预备至 Pro-Taper 系统的#F3 文件,以接收根管填充物。所有样本均接受 PDT 处理,并根据最终冲洗方案随机分为五组(n=20):组 1-蒸馏水+超声激活(US);组 2-17% EDTA;组 3-QMix;组 4-17% EDTA+US;组 5-QMix+US。每组根据用于粘结牙胶尖的根管封闭剂进一步随机分为两组(n=10):AH Plus 或 MTA Fillapex。通过推出试验评估粘结强度。在光学显微镜下观察失效模式。使用双向方差分析(ANOVA)和 Tukey 事后检验评估粘结强度,使用卡方检验(α=5%)评估失效模式。
无论是否联合 US 使用 17% EDTA 和 QMix 均可提高根管填充物与任何根管封闭剂的粘结强度(p<0.05)。AH Plus 显示出比 MTA Fillapex 更高的粘结强度(p<0.05)。无论测试的最终冲洗方案和根管封闭剂如何,所有组均表现出更高的内聚性失效倾向(p<0.05)。
无论是否联合 US 使用 17% EDTA 和 QMix,以及使用 AH Plus,均可提高先前接受 PDT 治疗的根管牙本质上根管填充物的粘结强度。