Research Group Diagnostics, Avans University of Applied Science, Hogeschoollaan 1, 4818 CR Breda, the Netherlands; Department of Family Practice, Erasmus Medical Centre, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Family Practice, Erasmus Medical Centre, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019 Jun;41:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
Prospective cohort study including patients with shoulder pain in primary care physiotherapy.
There is an increased tendency to use diagnostic ultrasound to aid the diagnostic strategy and target treatment. It is a relatively cheap and accessible imaging technique but the implications for practice and patients are unknown.
To study the influence of diagnostic ultrasound (DUS) on diagnostic work-up, treatment modalities and recovery.
Participants (n = 389) with a new episode of shoulder pain were assessed at baseline and followed for 6, 12 and 26 weeks. Diagnostic work-up, including the use of DUS, and treatment strategies were reported by the therapists at 3, 6 and 12 weeks.
Most patients (41%) were diagnosed with subacromial impingement/pain syndrome after physical examination or DUS. DUS was used in 31% of the participants. Tendinopathy was the most found abnormality in this sub-population. Patients who underwent DUS were more frequently treated using exercise therapy. Patients that not had DUS were more likely to receive massage therapy, trigger point therapy or mobilisation techniques. Logistic regression analyses did not show a significant association between DUS and recovery after 26 weeks (0.88, 95%CI:0.50-1.57). Correcting for the therapist as a confounder using a multilevel binary logistic regression did not show a significant cluster effect.
Diagnostic US as a work-up component does not seem to influence diagnosis or recovery but does influence the choice of treatment modality. Conclusions are limited to observational data. High quality randomized trials should study the effect of DUS on recovery.
在初级保健物理治疗中患有肩部疼痛的患者的前瞻性队列研究。
使用诊断性超声辅助诊断策略和靶向治疗的趋势有所增加。这是一种相对便宜且易于获得的成像技术,但对实践和患者的影响尚不清楚。
研究诊断性超声(DUS)对诊断性检查、治疗方式和恢复的影响。
在基线时评估了 389 名新出现肩部疼痛的参与者,并在 6、12 和 26 周时进行随访。治疗师在 3、6 和 12 周时报告了诊断性检查(包括 DUS 的使用)和治疗策略。
大多数患者(41%)在体格检查或 DUS 后被诊断为肩峰下撞击/疼痛综合征。在 31%的参与者中使用了 DUS。在这一亚人群中,最常见的异常是肌腱病。接受 DUS 的患者更频繁地接受运动疗法治疗。未接受 DUS 的患者更有可能接受按摩治疗、触发点治疗或松动技术。逻辑回归分析显示,26 周后 DUS 与恢复之间无显著相关性(0.88,95%CI:0.50-1.57)。使用多级二元逻辑回归校正治疗师作为混杂因素后,未显示出显著的聚类效应。
作为检查组成部分的诊断性超声似乎不会影响诊断或恢复,但会影响治疗方式的选择。结论仅限于观察性数据。高质量的随机试验应研究 DUS 对恢复的影响。