Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Department of Orthopedics, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 23;9(3):e028474. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028474.
Optimal management of distal radius fractures in adults remains controversial. Previous evidence and current clinical guidelines tell us that, if a closed reduction of a dorsally displaced fracture is possible, Kirschner wires (K-wires) are the preferred form of surgical fixation. However, the question remains whether there is any need to perform surgical fixation following a successful closed reduction, or is a simple plaster cast as effective? This is the protocol for a randomised controlled trial of manipulation and surgical fixation with K-wires versus manipulation and casting in the treatment of dorsally displaced distal radius fractures.
Adult patients with an acute dorsally displaced fracture of the distal radius are potentially eligible to take part. Prior to surgery, baseline demographic data, radiographs, data on pain/function using the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Score (PRWE) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) will be collected. A randomisation sequence, stratified by centre, intra-articular extension of the fracture and age, will be administered via a secure web-based service. Each patient will be randomly allocated to either 'manipulation and surgical fixation with K-wires' or 'manipulation and plaster casting'. A clinical assessment, radiographs and records of early complications will be recorded at 6 weeks. PRWE and HRQoL outcome data will be collected at 3, 6 and 12 months post-randomisation. Further information will be requested with regard to healthcare resource use and any complications.
The National Research Ethic Committee approved this study on 6 October 2016 (16/SC/0462).The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment monograph and a manuscript to a peer-reviewed journal will be submitted on completion of the trial. The results of this trial will substantially inform clinical practice on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the treatment of this injury.
ISRCTN11980540; Pre-results.
成人桡骨远端骨折的最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。先前的证据和当前的临床指南告诉我们,如果可以进行背侧移位骨折的闭合复位,克氏针(K 线)是首选的手术固定方式。然而,问题仍然是,在成功的闭合复位后是否有必要进行手术固定,或者单纯的石膏固定是否同样有效?这是一项关于手法复位联合 K 线固定与手法复位联合石膏固定治疗背侧移位桡骨远端骨折的随机对照试验方案。
急性背侧移位桡骨远端骨折的成年患者有潜在的参与资格。在手术前,将收集基线人口统计学数据、X 线片、使用患者腕部评估评分(PRWE)评估疼痛/功能的数据以及使用欧洲五维健康量表 5 级(EQ-5D-5L)评估健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的数据。通过安全的基于网络的服务,根据中心、关节内骨折延伸程度和年龄进行分层,随机分配序列。每个患者将随机分配到“手法复位联合 K 线固定”或“手法复位联合石膏固定”组。在 6 周时将进行临床评估、X 线片和早期并发症记录。在随机分组后 3、6 和 12 个月将收集 PRWE 和 HRQoL 结果数据。还将要求提供有关医疗资源使用情况和任何并发症的进一步信息。
国家研究伦理委员会于 2016 年 10 月 6 日批准了这项研究(16/SC/0462)。试验完成后,将向国家卫生研究院卫生技术评估专论和同行评议期刊提交一份手稿。这项试验的结果将极大地为这种损伤的治疗的临床和成本效益提供信息。
ISRCTN11980540;预结果。