Goldstein Stanley
Allergy and Asthma Care of Long Island, Rockville Centre, New York, NY, USA,
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019 Mar 14;15:437-449. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S161362. eCollection 2019.
The burden of uncontrolled asthma in children and adolescents is high. Treatment options for pediatric patients (aged under 18 years) with asthma are largely influenced by the Global Initiative for Asthma recommendations. Algorithms for adolescents (12-18 years) and adults are identical, but recommendations for children aged under 6 years and 6-11 years differ. Although the goals of treatment for pediatric patients with asthma are similar to those for adults, relatively few new therapies have been approved for this patient population within the last decade. Designing clinical trials involving children presents several challenges, notably that children are often less able to perform lung function tests, and traditional endpoints used in clinical trials with adults, such as forced expiratory volume in 1 second, asthma exacerbations and questionnaires, have limitations associated with their use in children. There are also ethical considerations related to the performance of longer placebo-controlled exacerbation trials. This review considers additional clinical endpoints to those traditionally reported, including forced expiratory flow at 25%-75% of forced vital capacity, which may help shed light on which treatments are most effective for use in pediatric patients with asthma. The pros and cons of specific and potentially clinically relevant endpoints are considered, along with device considerations and patient preferences that may enhance adherence and quality of life. Recent advances in the management of children and adolescents, including the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approval of tiotropium in patients with asthma aged 6 years and over, are also discussed.
儿童和青少年中未得到控制的哮喘负担很重。哮喘儿童患者(18岁以下)的治疗选择在很大程度上受全球哮喘防治创议建议的影响。青少年(12至18岁)和成人的治疗方案相同,但6岁以下和6至11岁儿童的治疗建议有所不同。尽管哮喘儿童患者的治疗目标与成人相似,但在过去十年中,获批用于该患者群体的新疗法相对较少。设计涉及儿童的临床试验存在若干挑战,尤其是儿童往往较难进行肺功能测试,而且成人临床试验中使用的传统终点指标,如一秒用力呼气量、哮喘急性加重情况和问卷调查,在用于儿童时存在局限性。在进行更长时间的安慰剂对照急性加重试验时也存在伦理考量。本综述考虑了除传统报告终点指标之外的其他临床终点指标,包括用力肺活量25%至75%时的用力呼气流量,这可能有助于阐明哪些治疗方法对哮喘儿童患者最有效。文中考虑了特定且可能具有临床相关性的终点指标的利弊,以及可能提高依从性和生活质量的设备考量因素和患者偏好。还讨论了儿童和青少年管理方面的最新进展,包括美国食品药品监督管理局和欧洲药品管理局批准6岁及以上哮喘患者使用噻托溴铵。