Przybylowski Colin J, Baranoski Jacob F, So Veronica M, Wilson Jeffrey, Sanai Nader
1Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute.
2University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix; and.
J Neurosurg. 2019 Apr 5;132(6):1731-1738. doi: 10.3171/2018.12.JNS183075. Print 2020 Jun 1.
The choice of transsylvian versus transcortical corridors for resection of insular gliomas remains controversial. Functional pathway compromise from transcortical transgression and vascular injury during transsylvian dissection are the primary concerns. In this study, data from a single-center experience with both approaches were compared to determine whether one approach was associated with a higher rate of morbidity than the other.
The authors identified 100 consecutive patients who underwent resection of pure insular gliomas at the Barrow Neurological Institute. Volumetric analysis was performed using FLAIR and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI for low- and high-grade gliomas, respectively, for extent of resection (EOR) and diffusion-weighted sequences were used to detect for postoperative ischemia. Step-wise logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of neurological morbidity.
Data from 100 patients with low-grade or high-grade insular gliomas were analyzed. Fifty-two patients (52%) underwent a transsylvian approach, and 48 patients (48%) underwent a transcortical approach. The mean (± SD) EOR was 91.6% ± 12.4% in the transsylvian group and 88.6% ± 14.2% in the transcortical group (p = 0.26). Clinical outcome metrics for the 2 groups were similar. Overall, 13 patients (25%) in the transsylvian group and 10 patients (21%) in the transcortical group had evidence of ischemia on postoperative MR images. For both approaches, high-grade histology was associated with permanent morbidity (p = 0.01). For patients with gliomas located within the superior-posterior quadrant of the insula, development of postoperative ischemia was associated with only the transsylvian approach (46% vs 0%, p = 0.02).
Areas of restricted diffusion are common on postoperative MRI following resection of insular gliomas, but only a minority of these patients develop permanent neurological deficits. Insular glioma patients with high-grade histology may be at particular risk for developing symptomatic postoperative ischemia. Both the transcortical and transsylvian corridors are associated with reasonable morbidity profiles, although gliomas situated within the superior-posterior quadrant of the insula are more safely accessed with a transcortical approach.
在切除岛叶胶质瘤时,经外侧裂与经皮质入路的选择仍存在争议。经皮质入路时皮质的侵犯以及经外侧裂解剖时血管的损伤所导致的功能通路受损是主要关注点。在本研究中,对单中心采用这两种入路的经验数据进行比较,以确定一种入路是否比另一种入路具有更高的发病率。
作者确定了100例在巴罗神经学研究所连续接受纯岛叶胶质瘤切除术的患者。分别使用液体衰减反转恢复序列(FLAIR)和对比增强T1加权磁共振成像(MRI)对低级别和高级别胶质瘤进行体积分析,以评估切除范围(EOR),并使用扩散加权序列检测术后缺血情况。进行逐步逻辑回归分析以确定神经功能障碍的预测因素。
分析了100例低级别或高级别岛叶胶质瘤患者的数据。52例患者(52%)采用经外侧裂入路,48例患者(48%)采用经皮质入路。经外侧裂组的平均(±标准差)切除范围为91.6%±12.4%,经皮质组为88.6%±14.2%(p = 0.26)。两组的临床结局指标相似。总体而言,经外侧裂组13例患者(25%)和经皮质组10例患者(21%)在术后MRI上有缺血证据。对于两种入路,高级别组织学均与永久性神经功能障碍相关(p = 0.01)。对于位于岛叶上后象限的胶质瘤患者,术后缺血的发生仅与经外侧裂入路相关(46%对0%,p = 0.02)。
岛叶胶质瘤切除术后的MRI上,扩散受限区域很常见,但这些患者中只有少数会出现永久性神经功能缺损。高级别组织学的岛叶胶质瘤患者术后发生有症状缺血的风险可能特别高。经皮质和经外侧裂入路的发病率均处于合理范围,不过对于位于岛叶上后象限的胶质瘤,采用经皮质入路更安全。