Suppr超能文献

大型学术型一级创伤中心的紧急和突发情况处理方案。

Protocol for Urgent and Emergent Cases at a Large Academic Level 1 Trauma Center.

作者信息

Ahmed Karim, Zygourakis Corinna, Kalb Sammy, Pennington Zach, Molina Camilo, Emerson Terry, Theodore Nicholas

机构信息

Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, USA.

Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2019 Jan 28;11(1):e3973. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3973.

Abstract

Background Level 1 trauma centers are capable of caring for every aspect of injury and contain 24-hour in-house coverage by general surgeons, with prompt availability of nearly all other disciplines upon request. Despite the wide variety of trauma, currently reported protocols often focus on a single surgical service and studies describing their implementation are lacking. The aim of the current study was to characterize all urgent and emergent cases at a large academic Level 1 trauma center, characterize the specialty and nature of emergent operative cases, and assess the efficacy of the institutional trauma protocol on timing of surgery. Methods For this retrospective review, all urgent and emergent cases treated at a single institution, during a 34-month period (January 1, 2015-October 31, 2017), were identified. All included cases were subject to the Institutional Guidelines for Operative Urgent/Emergent Cases. Demographic characteristics for non-elective surgical emergent cases were compiled by level of urgency and operating room (OR) waiting times were compared by year, department, and Level. Results A total of 11,206 urgent and emergent operative cases were included, among over 16 surgical departments. Level 2 cases represented the majority of urgent/emergent cases (33%-36%), followed by Level 3 (25%-26%), Level 1 (21%-22%), Level 4 (12%-16%), and Level 5 (2%-4%). Univariate analysis demonstrated that the proportion of urgent and emergent cases, by level of urgency, did not significantly differ between each year. Operating room waiting time decreased significantly over each year from 2015, 2016, and 2017: 193.40 ± 4.78, 177.20 ± 3.29, and 82.01 ± 2.98 minutes, respectively. Conclusions To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to characterize all urgent and emergent cases at a large academic Level 1 trauma center, outline the specialty and nature of emergent operative cases, and assess the efficacy of the institutional trauma protocol on surgical waiting times over a 34-month period.

摘要

背景

一级创伤中心有能力处理创伤的各个方面,有普通外科医生24小时驻院值班,其他几乎所有学科在需要时能迅速到位。尽管创伤种类繁多,但目前报道的方案往往侧重于单一外科服务,且缺乏描述其实施情况的研究。本研究的目的是描述一家大型学术性一级创伤中心所有紧急和急诊病例的特征,描述急诊手术病例的专业和性质,并评估机构创伤方案对手术时机的有效性。方法:对于这项回顾性研究,确定了在一个机构于34个月期间(2015年1月1日至2017年10月31日)治疗的所有紧急和急诊病例。所有纳入病例均遵循手术紧急/急诊病例的机构指南。非择期手术急诊病例的人口统计学特征按紧急程度进行汇总,并按年份、科室和级别比较手术室等待时间。结果:共纳入11206例紧急和急诊手术病例,涉及16个以上外科科室。2级病例占紧急/急诊病例的大多数(33%-36%),其次是3级(25%-26%)、1级(21%-22%)、4级(12%-16%)和5级(2%-4%)。单因素分析表明,按紧急程度划分的紧急和急诊病例比例在各年份之间无显著差异。手术室等待时间从2015年、2016年到2017年每年显著减少,分别为193.40±4.78分钟、177.20±3.29分钟和82.01±2.98分钟。结论:据作者所知,这是第一项描述大型学术性一级创伤中心所有紧急和急诊病例特征、概述急诊手术病例的专业和性质以及评估机构创伤方案在34个月期间对手术等待时间有效性的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7445/6438689/32aab2f50f24/cureus-0011-00000003973-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验