Wu San-Gang, Zhang Wen-Wen, Wang Jun, Dong Yong, Chen Yong-Xiong, He Zhen-Yu
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiamen 361003, People's Republic of China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China,
Onco Targets Ther. 2019 Mar 19;12:2071-2078. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S199625. eCollection 2019.
We aimed to assess the role of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) in the decision-making for surgical treatment in early stage breast cancer and compared the outcomes between breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy (MAST) among various 21-gene RS groups.
We included patients with stage T1-2M0M0 and estrogen receptor-positive breast invasive ductal carcinoma who underwent BCS + radiotherapy or MAST between 2004 and 2012 as part of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Data were analyzed using binomial logistic regression, multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, and propensity score matching (PSM).
We enrolled 34,447 patients including 22,681 (65.8%) and 11,766 (34.2%) who underwent BCS and MAST, respectively. Patients with high-risk RS were more likely to receive MAST. Multivariate analysis indicated that patients with intermediate-risk (<0.001) and high-risk (<0.001) RS had poor breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), as compared to those with low-risk RS. Moreover, patients who underwent MAST also exhibited poor BCSS (<0.001), as compared to those who underwent BCS. In low-risk (<0.001) and intermediate-risk (=0.020) RS groups, patients who underwent MAST had poor BCSS, as compared to those treated with BCS. However, BCSS was comparable between patients who underwent MAST and BCS (=0.952); similar trends were also observed after PSM.
The 21-gene RS may impact the decision-making for surgery in early stage breast cancer. Our study provides additional support for a shared decision-making process for BCS when both local management options are appropriate choices regardless of the 21-gene RS.
我们旨在评估21基因复发评分(RS)在早期乳腺癌手术治疗决策中的作用,并比较不同21基因RS组中保乳手术(BCS)和乳房切除术(MAST)的治疗结果。
我们纳入了2004年至2012年间作为监测、流行病学和最终结果计划一部分接受BCS + 放疗或MAST的T1-2M0M0期且雌激素受体阳性的乳腺浸润性导管癌患者。使用二项逻辑回归、多变量Cox比例风险模型和倾向评分匹配(PSM)进行数据分析。
我们纳入了34447例患者,其中分别有22681例(65.8%)和11766例(34.2%)接受了BCS和MAST。高风险RS患者更有可能接受MAST。多变量分析表明,与低风险RS患者相比,中风险(<0.001)和高风险(<0.001)RS患者的乳腺癌特异性生存率(BCSS)较差。此外,与接受BCS的患者相比,接受MAST的患者BCSS也较差(<0.001)。在低风险(<0.001)和中风险(=0.020)RS组中,与接受BCS治疗的患者相比,接受MAST的患者BCSS较差。然而,接受MAST和BCS的患者之间的BCSS相当(=0.952);PSM后也观察到类似趋势。
21基因RS可能会影响早期乳腺癌的手术决策。我们的研究为当两种局部治疗方案都是合适选择时,无论21基因RS如何,BCS的共同决策过程提供了额外支持。