1 Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University , Nathan, Queensland 4014 , Australia.
2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland , Brisbane, Queensland 4072 , Australia.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Apr 1;374(1769):20180201. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0201.
Classic evolutionary theory predicts that monogamy should be intimately linked with parental care. It has long been assumed, therefore, that avian brood parasites-which lay their eggs in the nests of 'host' species and provide little, if any, parental care-should be overwhelmingly promiscuous. However, recent studies have revealed that the social mating systems of brood parasites are surprisingly diverse, encompassing lek polygyny, monogamy, polygamy and promiscuity. What ecological or phylogenetic factors explain this variation, and why are some brood parasites apparently monogamous? Here we review the social and genetic mating systems of all 75 brood parasitic species for which data are available and evaluate several hypotheses that may help explain these patterns. We find that social monogamy is widespread, often co-occurring with territoriality and cooperative behaviour by the mated pair. Comparative studies, though preliminary, suggest that in some species, monogamy is associated with low host density and polygamy with higher host density. Interestingly, molecular data show that genetic and social mating systems can be entirely decoupled: genetic monogamy can occur in parasitic species that lack behavioural pair-bonds, possibly as a by-product of territoriality; conversely, social monogamy has been reported in parasites that are genetically polygamous. This synthesis suggests that social and genetic monogamy may result from very different selective pressures, and that male-female cooperative behaviours, population density and territoriality may all interact to favour the evolution of monogamous mating in brood parasites. Given that detailed descriptive data of social, and especially genetic, mating systems are still lacking for the majority of brood parasitic species, definitive tests of these hypotheses await future work. This article is part of the theme issue 'The coevolutionary biology of brood parasitism: from mechanism to pattern'.
经典进化理论预测,一夫一妻制应该与亲代抚育密切相关。因此,人们长期以来一直认为,鸟类巢寄生者——它们将卵产在“宿主”物种的巢中,很少或根本不提供亲代抚育——应该是极度滥交的。然而,最近的研究表明,巢寄生者的社会交配系统非常多样化,包括狍一夫多妻制、一夫一妻制、一妻多夫制和滥交。哪些生态或系统发育因素解释了这种变异,以及为什么有些巢寄生者显然是一夫一妻制的?在这里,我们回顾了所有 75 种有数据可查的巢寄生物种的社会和遗传交配系统,并评估了几个可能有助于解释这些模式的假设。我们发现,社会一夫一妻制很普遍,通常与配偶的领地行为和合作行为同时出现。虽然比较研究还处于初步阶段,但有迹象表明,在某些物种中,一夫一妻制与宿主密度低有关,而一妻多夫制与宿主密度高有关。有趣的是,分子数据表明,遗传和社会交配系统可以完全脱钩:遗传一夫一妻制可能发生在缺乏行为性配对的寄生物种中,这可能是领地行为的副产品;相反,社会一夫一妻制也存在于遗传上是多配偶制的寄生虫中。这种综合表明,社会和遗传一夫一妻制可能是由非常不同的选择压力产生的,而雌雄合作行为、种群密度和领地性可能都相互作用,有利于巢寄生者一夫一妻制的进化。鉴于大多数巢寄生物种的社会,尤其是遗传,交配系统的详细描述性数据仍然缺乏,这些假设的明确测试还需要未来的工作。本文是主题为“巢寄生协同进化生物学:从机制到模式”的特刊的一部分。