• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哥伦比亚麦德林市三级医院急诊科收治的脓毒症患者感染部位与院内死亡率之间的关联

Association between site of infection and in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis admitted to emergency departments of tertiary hospitals in Medellin, Colombia.

作者信息

Caraballo César, Ascuntar Johana, Hincapié Carolina, Restrepo Camilo, Bernal Elisa, Jaimes Fabián

机构信息

Grupo Académico de Epidemiología Clínica, Universidad de Antioquia - Medellín, Colombia.

Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale University School of Medicine - New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2019 Jan-Mar;31(1):47-56. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20190011.

DOI:10.5935/0103-507X.20190011
PMID:30970091
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6443304/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between the primary site of infection and in-hospital mortality as the main outcome, or the need for admission to the intensive care unit as a secondary outcome, in patients with sepsis admitted to the emergency department.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort. Patients included in the study were older than 18 years with a diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock who were admitted to the emergency departments of three tertiary care hospitals. Of the 5022 eligible participants, 2510 were included. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed for mortality.

RESULTS

The most common site of infection was the urinary tract, present in 27.8% of the cases, followed by pneumonia (27.5%) and intra-abdominal focus (10.8%). In 5.4% of the cases, no definite site of infection was identified on admission. Logistic regression revealed a significant association between the following sites of infection and in-hospital mortality when using the urinary infection group as a reference: pneumonia (OR 3.4; 95%CI, 2.2 - 5.2; p < 0.001), skin and soft tissues (OR 2.6; 95%CI, 1.4 - 5.0; p = 0.003), bloodstream (OR 2.0; 95%CI, 1.1 - 3.6; p = 0.018), without specific focus (OR 2.0; 95%CI, 1.1 - 3.8; p = 0.028), and intra-abdominal focus (OR 1.9; 95%CI, 1.1 - 3.3; p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant association between the different sites of infection and in-hospital mortality or the need for admission to an intensive care unit in patients with sepsis or septic shock. Urinary tract infection shows the lowest risk, which should be considered in prognostic models of these conditions.

摘要

目的

确定急诊科收治的脓毒症患者感染的主要部位与作为主要结局的院内死亡率之间的关联,以及与作为次要结局的入住重症监护病房需求之间的关联。

方法

这是一项对多中心前瞻性队列研究的二次分析。纳入研究的患者年龄大于18岁,诊断为严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克,被收治于三家三级医疗机构的急诊科。在5022名符合条件的参与者中,2510名被纳入。对死亡率进行了多重逻辑回归分析。

结果

最常见的感染部位是泌尿系统,占病例的27.8%,其次是肺炎(27.5%)和腹腔内病灶(10.8%)。在5.4%的病例中,入院时未确定明确的感染部位。逻辑回归显示,以泌尿系统感染组作为参照时,以下感染部位与院内死亡率之间存在显著关联:肺炎(比值比3.4;95%置信区间,2.2 - 5.2;p < 0.001)、皮肤和软组织(比值比2.6;95%置信区间,1.4 - 5.0;p = 0.003)、血流(比值比2.0;95%置信区间,1.1 - 3.6;p = 0.018)、无特定病灶(比值比2.0;95%置信区间,1.1 - 3.8;p = 0.028)以及腹腔内病灶(比值比1.9;95%置信区间,1.1 - 3.3;p = 0.024)。

结论

脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者不同的感染部位与院内死亡率或入住重症监护病房的需求之间存在显著关联。泌尿系统感染显示出最低风险,在这些病症的预后模型中应予以考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ed3/6443304/a77b088d70ac/rbti-31-01-0047-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ed3/6443304/a77b088d70ac/rbti-31-01-0047-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ed3/6443304/a77b088d70ac/rbti-31-01-0047-g01.jpg

相似文献

1
Association between site of infection and in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis admitted to emergency departments of tertiary hospitals in Medellin, Colombia.哥伦比亚麦德林市三级医院急诊科收治的脓毒症患者感染部位与院内死亡率之间的关联
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2019 Jan-Mar;31(1):47-56. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20190011.
2
The epidemiology of sepsis in Colombia: a prospective multicenter cohort study in ten university hospitals.哥伦比亚脓毒症的流行病学:十所大学医院的前瞻性多中心队列研究。
Crit Care Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1675-82. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318218a35e.
3
The outcome of patients with sepsis and septic shock presenting to emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand.在澳大利亚和新西兰的急诊科就诊的脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的治疗结果。
Crit Care Resusc. 2007 Mar;9(1):8-18.
4
Primary Infection Site as a Predictor of Sepsis Development in Emergency Department Patients.急诊患者原发感染部位与发生脓毒症的相关性研究
J Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;67(2):e128-e137. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.01.016. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
5
Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of community-acquired severe sepsis and septic shock: a prospective observational study in 12 university hospitals in Korea.韩国 12 所大学医院开展的一项前瞻性观察性研究:社区获得性严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的流行病学和临床特征。
J Korean Med Sci. 2012 Nov;27(11):1308-14. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.11.1308. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
6
Severe sepsis in the emergency department - an observational cohort study from the university hospital of the West Indies.急诊科的严重脓毒症——来自西印度群岛大学医院的一项观察性队列研究。
West Indian Med J. 2013 Mar;62(3):224-9.
7
Patterns and Outcomes Associated With Timeliness of Initial Crystalloid Resuscitation in a Prospective Sepsis and Septic Shock Cohort.前瞻性脓毒症和脓毒性休克队列中初始晶体液复苏及时性相关的模式及结果
Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct;45(10):1596-1606. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002574.
8
Site of infection and mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. A cohort study of patients admitted to a Danish general intensive care unit.严重脓毒症或感染性休克患者的感染部位和死亡率。丹麦普通重症监护病房收治的患者队列研究。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2016 Oct;48(10):726-31. doi: 10.3109/23744235.2016.1168938. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
9
Are patients with cancer with sepsis and bacteraemia at a higher risk of mortality? A retrospective chart review of patients presenting to a tertiary care centre in Lebanon.患有癌症且并发脓毒症和菌血症的患者死亡率更高吗?对黎巴嫩一家三级护理中心的患者进行的回顾性病历审查。
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 13;7(3):e013502. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013502.
10
Clinical Characteristics and Current Interventions in Shock Patients in Chinese Emergency Departments: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.中国急诊科休克患者的临床特征及当前干预措施:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究
Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 May 20;130(10):1146-1154. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.205862.

引用本文的文献

1
Sepsis survivors readmitted within 30 days: outcomes of a single-center retrospective study.30天内再次入院的脓毒症幸存者:一项单中心回顾性研究的结果
Crit Care Sci. 2024 Dec 16;36:e20240116en. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240116-en. eCollection 2024.
2
Validation of MEWS, NEWS, NEWS-2 and qSOFA for different infection foci at the emergency department, the acutelines cohort.验证 MEWS、NEWS、NEWS-2 和 qSOFA 在急诊科不同感染灶中的有效性,acutelines 队列。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Dec;43(12):2441-2452. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-04961-1. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
3
Mortality and Risk Factors of Death in Patients with AmpC -Lactamase Producing Bloodstream Infection: A .

本文引用的文献

1
Head-to-head comparison of qSOFA and SIRS criteria in predicting the mortality of infected patients in the emergency department: a meta-analysis.头对头比较 qSOFA 和 SIRS 标准在预测急诊科感染患者死亡率中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Jul 11;26(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0527-9.
2
Positive Culture and Prognosis in Patients With Sepsis: A Prospective Cohort Study.脓毒症患者的阳性文化与预后:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug;35(8):755-762. doi: 10.1177/0885066618783656. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
3
Accuracy of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria for predicting mortality in hospitalized patients with suspected infection: a meta-analysis of observational studies.
产AmpC内酰胺酶血流感染患者的死亡率及死亡风险因素:A.
Infect Drug Resist. 2024 Sep 18;17:4023-4035. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S473789. eCollection 2024.
4
Predictive Value of Multiple Scoring Systems in the Prognosis of Septic Patients with Different Infection Sites: Analysis of the Medical Information Mart for the Intensive Care IV Database.多种评分系统对不同感染部位脓毒症患者预后的预测价值:重症监护IV数据库医学信息集市分析
Biomedicines. 2024 Jun 25;12(7):1415. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12071415.
5
One-year survival of patients admitted for sepsis to intensive care units in Colombia.哥伦比亚重症监护病房收治脓毒症患者的一年生存率。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Jul 9;24(1):678. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09584-7.
6
Analysis of the effects of early screening combined with blood lactate on the severity of patients with sepsis.早期筛查联合血乳酸对脓毒症患者病情严重程度的影响分析
Heliyon. 2024 May 23;10(11):e31907. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31907. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
7
Association between reduced muscle mass and poor prognosis of biliary sepsis.肌肉减少症与胆道感染预后不良的关系。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 22;14(1):1857. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52502-9.
8
An Individualized Nomogram for Predicting Mortality Risk of Septic Shock Patients During Hospitalization: A ten Years Retrospective Analysis.用于预测脓毒症休克患者住院期间死亡风险的个体化列线图:十年回顾性分析
Infect Drug Resist. 2023 Sep 20;16:6247-6257. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S427790. eCollection 2023.
9
Infections in Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase G6PD-Deficient Patients; Predictors for Infection-Related Mortalities and Treatment Outcomes.葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶(G6PD)缺乏症患者的感染;感染相关死亡率和治疗结果的预测因素
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Mar 1;12(3):494. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030494.
10
T cell activation profiles can distinguish gram negative/positive bacterial sepsis and are associated with ICU discharge.T 细胞激活谱可区分革兰氏阴性/阳性菌败血症,并与 ICU 出院相关。
Front Immunol. 2023 Jan 10;13:1058606. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1058606. eCollection 2022.
快速序贯器官衰竭评估 (qSOFA) 评分和全身性炎症反应综合征 (SIRS) 标准对疑似感染住院患者死亡率预测的准确性:观察性研究的荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Nov;24(11):1123-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.032. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
4
Prognostic Accuracy of the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for Mortality in Patients With Suspected Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.快速序贯器官衰竭评估对疑似感染患者死亡率的预后准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Feb 20;168(4):266-275. doi: 10.7326/M17-2820. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
5
A Comparison of the Quick-SOFA and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria for the Diagnosis of Sepsis and Prediction of Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.快速序贯器官衰竭评估与全身性炎症反应综合征标准对脓毒症诊断及死亡率预测的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Chest. 2018 Mar;153(3):646-655. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.12.015. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
6
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria and the prediction of hospital mortality in critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort study.全身炎症反应综合征标准与危重症患者医院死亡率的预测:一项回顾性队列研究。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017 Jul-Sep;29(3):317-324. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20170047. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
7
Low Accuracy of Positive qSOFA Criteria for Predicting 28-Day Mortality in Critically Ill Septic Patients During the Early Period After Emergency Department Presentation.急诊就诊后早期危重症脓毒症患者 qSOFA 标准阳性预测 28 天死亡率的准确性较低。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;71(1):1-9.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
8
The characteristics and impact of source of infection on sepsis-related ICU outcomes.感染源对脓毒症相关重症监护病房结局的特征及影响。
J Crit Care. 2017 Oct;41:170-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.05.019. Epub 2017 May 23.
9
Early, Goal-Directed Therapy for Septic Shock - A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis.早期目标导向治疗脓毒性休克的患者水平荟萃分析。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2223-2234. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1701380. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
10
An Emergency Department Validation of the SEP-3 Sepsis and Septic Shock Definitions and Comparison With 1992 Consensus Definitions.急诊科对SEP-3脓毒症和脓毒性休克定义的验证及与1992年共识定义的比较
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;70(4):544-552.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Mar 3.