Disciplina de Reumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Departamento de Diagnostico por Imagem, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2019;74:e727. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2019/e727. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
To compare the ultrasonographic findings of entheses in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with those of healthy control individuals and to assess the ability of ultrasound (US) to identify aspects related to the disease.
A cross-sectional study involving 50 patients with AS and 30 healthy controls was performed. Clinical assessment included the use of a visual analog scale for pain, assessment of swelling of the enthesis, global assessments for patients and physician, use of a disease activity index, mobility and dysfunctional indices, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and clinical enthesitis index. US was performed for the following entheses by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists: brachial triceps, distal quadriceps, proximal and distal patellar tendons, calcaneal tendon, and plantar fascia; the total and subitems of the Madrid Sonographic Enthesitis Index were used for evaluations.
Comparison between groups showed a statistically significant difference with worse scores in AS patients, with bone erosion of the calcaneal enthesis and bone erosion and thickening of the plantar fascia. The odds ratio for thickening of the plantar fascia in the AS group was 3.47, according to logistic regression analysis. The AS group also had worse scores regarding the presence of calcification in the quadriceps enthesis, with a fivefold increased risk.
US analysis showed that only entheses of the foot and quadriceps were able to differentiate AS patients from healthy individuals.
比较强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者和健康对照者附着点的超声表现,并评估超声识别与疾病相关方面的能力。
进行了一项横断面研究,共纳入 50 例 AS 患者和 30 例健康对照者。临床评估包括使用视觉模拟评分法评估疼痛、附着点肿胀的评估、患者和医生的整体评估、使用疾病活动指数、活动和功能障碍指数、红细胞沉降率和临床附着点指数。由两位有经验的肌肉骨骼放射科医生对以下附着点进行超声检查:肱三头肌附着点、远端四头肌附着点、近端和远端髌腱、跟腱和足底筋膜;使用马德里超声附着点指数的总评分和分项评分进行评估。
组间比较显示,AS 患者的评分明显较差,存在跟腱附着点的骨侵蚀以及足底筋膜的骨侵蚀和增厚。根据逻辑回归分析,AS 组足底筋膜增厚的优势比为 3.47。AS 组在四头肌附着点存在钙化方面的评分也较差,风险增加了五倍。
超声分析显示,只有足部和四头肌的附着点能够将 AS 患者与健康个体区分开来。