Suppr超能文献

一项评估全膝关节置换术后肢体管理的更新荟萃分析——最佳方法是什么?

An updated meta-analysis evaluating limb management after total knee arthroplasty-what is the optimal method?

作者信息

Wang Hai-Yang, Yu Guang-Shu, Li Jie-Hui, Zhang Shou-Xiong, Lin Yan-Bin

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Fuzhou the Second Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, 47 Shangteng Road, Fuzhou, 350,007, Fujian, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Apr 10;14(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1140-y.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Postoperative knee flexion protocol has been widely recognized as a highly attractive, simple, and cost-effective tactic to improve patient's outcomes after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, optimal knee position and duration of knee flexion are still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of different postoperative knee flexion protocols, as an aid to find out optimal limb management strategy following TKA.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis to identify the available and relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with regard to the influence of different postoperative knee positions on clinical outcomes after primary TKA in electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Med Online, and VIP, up to May 2018. In this meta-analysis, three major subgroups based on diverse postoperative knee flexion protocols were considered: long-term (≥ 24 h) high flexion (> 30°), short term (< 24 h) high flexion (> 30°), and long-term (≥ 24 h) mild flexion (≤ 30°). The statistical analysis was performed using the Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of 16 trials were finally included in this meta-analysis. The result of subgroup analysis indicated that keeping the knee in high flexion (> 30°) postoperatively for a long time (≥ 24 h) significantly reduced total blood loss (P < 0.00001), hidden blood loss (P < 0.00001), and transfusion requirements (P = 0.003) and led to a significant improvement in range of motion (ROM) at 1 week after operation (P < 0.00001); keeping the knee in high flexion (> 30°) postoperatively for a short time (< 24 h) significantly reduced total blood loss (P = 0.006) and hidden blood loss (P < 0.00001) but not significantly improved ROM at 1 week after operation (P = 0.34) and reduced transfusion requirements (P = 0.62); and keeping the knee in mild flexion (≤ 30°) postoperatively for a long time (≥ 24 h) significantly reduced total blood loss (P = 0.02) and transfusion requirements (P = 0.02) and improved ROM at 1 week after operation (P < 0.00001) but not significantly reduced hidden blood loss (P = 0.11). Furthermore, there was no significant difference with respect to the rates of wound-related infection and DVT between the three knee flexion subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed that the long-term (≥ 24 h) high flexion (> 30°) protocol could be an optimal limb management to reduce blood loss and blood transfusion requirements and facilitate early postoperative rehabilitation exercises in patients after primary TKA without increasing in complication rate.

摘要

目的

术后膝关节屈曲方案已被广泛认为是一种极具吸引力、简单且经济高效的策略,可改善初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)后患者的预后。然而,最佳的膝关节位置和膝关节屈曲持续时间仍存在争议。本荟萃分析的目的是比较不同术后膝关节屈曲方案的有效性,以辅助找出TKA术后最佳的肢体管理策略。

方法

我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以识别电子数据库(包括PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、科学网、中国知网、万方医学网和维普)中关于不同术后膝关节位置对初次TKA术后临床结局影响的可用且相关的随机对照试验(RCT),检索截至2018年5月。在本荟萃分析中,基于不同的术后膝关节屈曲方案考虑了三个主要亚组:长期(≥24小时)高屈曲(>30°)、短期(<24小时)高屈曲(>30°)和长期(≥24小时)轻度屈曲(≤30°)。使用Review Manager(RevMan)5.3版软件进行统计分析。

结果

本荟萃分析最终共纳入16项试验。亚组分析结果表明,术后长时间(≥24小时)将膝关节保持在高屈曲(>30°)显著减少总失血量(P<0.00001)、隐性失血量(P<0.00001)和输血需求(P = 0.003),并导致术后1周时关节活动度(ROM)显著改善(P<0.00001);术后短时间(<24小时)将膝关节保持在高屈曲(>30°)显著减少总失血量(P = 0.006)和隐性失血量(P<0.00001),但术后1周时ROM未显著改善(P = 0.34),输血需求减少(P = 0.62);术后长时间(≥24小时)将膝关节保持在轻度屈曲(≤30°)显著减少总失血量(P = 0.02)和输血需求(P = 0.02),并改善术后1周时的ROM(P<0.00001),但隐性失血量未显著减少(P = 0.11)。此外,三个膝关节屈曲亚组之间在伤口相关感染率和深静脉血栓形成方面无显著差异。

结论

本荟萃分析表明,长期(≥24小时)高屈曲(>30°)方案可能是一种最佳的肢体管理方法,可减少初次TKA术后患者的失血量和输血需求,并促进术后早期康复锻炼,且不增加并发症发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/646f/6457036/0667c0158ecb/13018_2019_1140_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验