Soboku Tomohiro, Motegi Etsuko, Sueishi Kenji
Department of Orthodontics, Tokyo Dental College.
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2019 Jun 21;60(2):69-80. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.2018-0030. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
Various types of bracket are currently available, and different prescriptions are provided for the same type of tooth. There are no definite criteria, however, on which to base bracket selection. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in the angulation and inclination of orthodontically aligned teeth when using different prescription brackets. Thirty patients undergoing orthodontic treatment for maxillary protrusion and crowding were enrolled. After orthodontic treatment with a pre-adjusted appliance, angulation and inclination were measured on dental casts obtained from these patients (10 each with 0.022 MBT, 0.022 Roth, or 0.018 Roth brackets). The dental casts were scanned and digitized using a 3-dimensional (3-D) scanner and measured with 3-D model measurement software. A significant difference was observed in the mean angulation of the mandibular canine between the 0.022 MBT (5.81°) and 0.018 Roth groups (9.07°). Greater mesial inclination was observed in the 0.018 Roth group. No significant difference was observed in any of the other regions measured. Differences in bracket prescription showed no clinical influence on treatment outcomes. A significant difference was observed in the mandibular canine (p<0.05), suggesting that consideration is required when selecting brackets.
目前有各种类型的托槽,并且针对同一类型的牙齿提供了不同的处方。然而,对于托槽的选择并没有明确的标准。本研究的目的是调查使用不同处方托槽时正畸排齐牙齿的角度和倾斜度的差异。招募了30例因上颌前突和牙列拥挤接受正畸治疗的患者。在用预调整矫治器进行正畸治疗后,对从这些患者获得的石膏模型(分别有10例使用0.022 MBT托槽、0.022 Roth托槽或0.018 Roth托槽)测量角度和倾斜度。使用三维(3-D)扫描仪对石膏模型进行扫描和数字化处理,并使用3-D模型测量软件进行测量。在0.022 MBT组(5.81°)和0.018 Roth组(9.07°)之间观察到下颌尖牙的平均角度存在显著差异。在0.018 Roth组中观察到更大的近中倾斜度。在测量的任何其他区域均未观察到显著差异。托槽处方的差异对治疗结果没有临床影响。在下颌尖牙中观察到显著差异(p<0.05),这表明在选择托槽时需要考虑。