1 Departamento de Fitopatologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG 36570-000, Brazil.
2 Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Sciences, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, U.S.A.; and.
Plant Dis. 2019 Jun;103(6):1347-1356. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-10-18-1718-RE. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
Two diagrammatic ordinal scales are available in the Estimate app (2017 version) for Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) severity on table beet: 10% linear (linear-based diagrammatic scale [LIN]) and logarithmic based (Horsfall-Barratt [HB]). These allow for estimating severity data of four types depending on the system used. A group of 30 raters assigned percentage severity on 30 photographs of diseased table beet leaves during five rounds first without an aid and then using each of the four rating systems in Estimate. In two, the perceived ordinal score of the HB or LIN scale was assigned where severity of the subject fit best. HB2 and LIN2 involved a second choice of unitary severity within the perceived score interval. There was large variation in unaided ability of raters to estimate severity: 13% were accurate (Lin's concordance correlation [LCC] > 0.9), 23% were inaccurate (LCC < 0.7), and the remaining had moderate accuracy. Larger disparities between assigned and actual ordinal scores (mostly overestimates) occurred using the LIN compared with the HB. The LIN2 produced the most accurate estimates (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, = 0.96; generalized bias parameter, = 0.99; Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.95) and the greatest interrater reliability (overall concordance correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.93). The two-step process using the 10% linear scale is recommended for severity estimates of CLS in table beet.
有两种图示等级量表可用于 Estimate 应用程序(2017 年版)评估块根甜菜叶斑病(CLS)严重程度:10%线性(基于线性的图示量表 [LIN])和基于对数的(Horsfall-Barratt [HB])。这允许根据使用的系统估计四种类型的严重度数据。一组 30 名评估者在五次轮次中对 30 张患病块根甜菜叶片的照片进行了百分比严重度评估,第一次是没有辅助工具,然后使用 Estimate 中的四种评分系统中的每一种。在两种情况下,HB 或 LIN 量表的感知等级分数被分配,其中主体的严重度最符合该分数。HB2 和 LIN2 涉及在感知得分间隔内对单一严重度的第二选择。评估者独立估计严重度的能力存在很大差异:13%的人是准确的(Lin 的一致性相关系数 [LCC] > 0.9),23%的人是不准确的(LCC < 0.7),其余的人具有中等准确性。与 HB 相比,使用 LIN 时分配的和实际等级分数之间的差异更大(主要是高估)。LIN2 产生了最准确的估计值(Lin 的一致性相关系数, = 0.96;广义偏差参数, = 0.99;Pearson 相关系数, = 0.95)和最大的评估者间可靠性(总体一致性相关系数和组内相关系数 > 0.93)。推荐使用 10%线性量表的两步法来评估块根甜菜的 CLS 严重程度。