Martin W, Smith J A, White D G
Br J Pharmacol. 1986 Nov;89(3):563-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1986.tb11157.x.
The mechanisms by which haemoglobin and methaemoglobin inhibit the vasodilator actions of glyceryl trinitrate, sodium azide, nitric oxide, and the bovine retractor penis inhibitory factor (IF) were studied on rabbit endothelium-denuded aortic rings. Methaemoglobin was less effective than haemoglobin against each vasodilator, it was more effective at inhibiting the relaxation to azide than that to glyceryl trinitrate. Glyceryl trinitrate was neither bound nor inactivated when passed through columns of haemoglobin-agarose or methaemoglobin-agarose. Azide was reversibly bound but less by haemoglobin-agarose than by methaemoglobin-agarose. Inhibition of the vasodilator actions of glyceryl trinitrate is not attributable therefore to a direct interaction with the haemoproteins, although a small part of the inhibition of azide-induced relaxation by methaemoglobin is likely to be due to a direct interaction. Columns of haemoglobin-agarose were more effective than columns of methaemoglobin-agarose in removing nitric oxide from solution. The greater ability of haemoglobin, compared to methaemoglobin, to inhibit vasodilatation induced by nitrovasodilators may therefore reflect the greater ability of haemoglobin to bind nitric oxide which is the active principle of the nitrovasodilators. Neither the acid-activated nor the inactive forms of IF were bound or inactivated when passed through columns of methaemoglobin-agarose. Neither form of IF was retained on passage through columns of haemoglobin-agarose, but the resulting activity in the eluates was less than control, was unstable and, unlike the original activity, decayed rapidly on ice. The greater ability of haemoglobin, compared to methaemoglobin, to inhibit vasodilatation induced by IF might therefore reflect the greater ability of haemoglobin to interact with this vasodilator and inactivate it.
在兔去内皮主动脉环上研究了血红蛋白和高铁血红蛋白抑制硝酸甘油、叠氮化钠、一氧化氮及牛阴茎海绵体抑制因子(IF)舒张血管作用的机制。高铁血红蛋白对每种舒张血管剂的作用均不如血红蛋白有效,其抑制叠氮化钠诱导的舒张作用比抑制硝酸甘油诱导的舒张作用更有效。硝酸甘油通过血红蛋白琼脂糖或高铁血红蛋白琼脂糖柱时既不结合也不被灭活。叠氮化钠可被可逆结合,但血红蛋白琼脂糖对其结合能力低于高铁血红蛋白琼脂糖。因此,硝酸甘油舒张血管作用的抑制并非归因于与血红素蛋白的直接相互作用,尽管高铁血红蛋白对叠氮化钠诱导舒张作用的部分抑制可能是由于直接相互作用。血红蛋白琼脂糖柱在从溶液中去除一氧化氮方面比高铁血红蛋白琼脂糖柱更有效。因此,与高铁血红蛋白相比,血红蛋白抑制硝基血管舒张剂诱导的血管舒张的能力更强,这可能反映了血红蛋白结合一氧化氮的能力更强,而一氧化氮是硝基血管舒张剂的活性成分。IF的酸活化形式和非活性形式通过高铁血红蛋白琼脂糖柱时既不结合也不被灭活。两种形式的IF通过血红蛋白琼脂糖柱时均未被保留,但洗脱液中的活性低于对照,不稳定,且与原始活性不同,在冰上迅速衰减。因此,与高铁血红蛋白相比,血红蛋白抑制IF诱导的血管舒张的能力更强,这可能反映了血红蛋白与这种舒张血管剂相互作用并使其失活的能力更强。