治疗艰难梭菌感染方案的成本效益:对 2018 年传染病学会美国指南的评估。

Cost-effectiveness of Treatment Regimens for Clostridioides difficile Infection: An Evaluation of the 2018 Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases and International Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota.

Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Feb 14;70(5):754-762. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz318.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2018, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) published guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile infection (CDI). However, there is little guidance regarding which treatments are cost-effective.

METHODS

We used a Markov model to simulate a cohort of patients presenting with an initial CDI diagnosis. We used the model to estimate the costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of different CDI treatment regimens recommended in the recently published 2018 IDSA guidelines. The model includes stratification by the severity of the initial infection, and subsequent likelihood of cure, recurrence, mortality, and outcomes of subsequent recurrences. Data sources were taken from IDSA guidelines and published literature on treatment outcomes. Outcome measures were discounted quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

RESULTS

Use of fidaxomicin for nonsevere initial CDI, vancomycin for severe CDI, fidaxomicin for first recurrence, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for subsequent recurrence (strategy 44) cost an additional $478 for 0.009 QALYs gained per CDI patient, resulting in an ICER of $31 751 per QALY, below the willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY. This is the optimal, cost-effective CDI treatment strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Metronidazole is suboptimal for nonsevere CDI as it is less beneficial than alternative strategies. The preferred treatment regimen is fidaxomicin for nonsevere CDI, vancomycin for severe CDI, fidaxomicin for first recurrence, and FMT for subsequent recurrence. The most effective treatments, with highest cure rates, are also cost-effective due to averted mortality, utility loss, and costs of rehospitalization and/or further treatments for recurrent CDI.

摘要

背景

2018 年,美国传染病学会(IDSA)发布了艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的诊断和治疗指南。然而,对于哪些治疗方法具有成本效益,指南几乎没有提供指导。

方法

我们使用马尔可夫模型来模拟一组初诊 CDI 患者的队列。我们使用该模型来评估 2018 年 IDSA 指南中推荐的不同 CDI 治疗方案的成本、效果和成本效益。该模型按初始感染的严重程度以及随后的治愈、复发、死亡率和后续复发的结果进行分层。数据来源取自 IDSA 指南和关于治疗结果的已发表文献。结果衡量指标为贴现后的质量调整生命年(QALY)、成本和增量成本效益比(ICER)。

结果

对于非重度初诊 CDI 使用非达霉素、重度 CDI 使用万古霉素、首次复发使用非达霉素、随后复发使用粪便微生物移植(FMT)(方案 44)会使每位 CDI 患者的成本增加 478 美元,而每获得 0.009 个 QALY 的收益,增量成本效益比为 31751 美元/QALY,低于 100000 美元/QALY 的意愿支付阈值。这是最优的、具有成本效益的 CDI 治疗策略。

结论

甲硝唑对非重度 CDI 是次优的,因为其获益不如其他方案。首选的治疗方案是非达霉素治疗非重度 CDI、万古霉素治疗重度 CDI、非达霉素治疗首次复发、FMT 治疗随后复发。由于可避免死亡率、效用损失以及因再次住院和/或复发 CDI 而进行的进一步治疗的成本,最有效的治疗方法具有最高的治愈率,同时也具有成本效益。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索