Suppr超能文献

目的论本质主义。

Teleological Essentialism.

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Florida State University.

Department of Philosophy, University of Arizona.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2019 Apr;43(4):e12725. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12725.

Abstract

Placeholder essentialism is the view that there is a causal essence that holds category members together, though we may not know what the essence is. Sometimes the placeholder can be filled in by scientific essences, such as when we acquire scientific knowledge that the atomic weight of gold is 79. We challenge the view that placeholders are elaborated by scientific essences. In our view, if placeholders are elaborated, they are elaborated by Aristotelian essences, a telos. Utilizing the same kind of experiments used by traditional essentialists-involving superficial change (study 1), transformation of insides (study 2), acquired traits (study 3), and inferences about offspring (study 4)-we find support for the view that essences are elaborated by a telos. And we find evidence (study 5) that teleological essences may generate category judgments.

摘要

占位本质主义认为,尽管我们可能不知道本质是什么,但有一种因果本质将类别成员联系在一起。有时占位符可以用科学本质来填充,例如当我们获得科学知识,即金的原子量为 79 时。我们质疑占位符是由科学本质来详细阐述的观点。在我们看来,如果占位符被详细阐述,那么它们是由亚里士多德本质即目的来详细阐述的。利用传统本质主义者使用的相同类型的实验——涉及表面变化(研究 1)、内部转化(研究 2)、后天特征(研究 3)和关于后代的推断(研究 4)——我们发现目的论本质可以详细阐述本质的观点得到了支持。我们还发现了证据(研究 5),表明目的论本质可能会产生类别判断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验