Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Jun;20(6):134-140. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12590. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
It is unclear if a 3D transducer with the special design of mechanical swing or 2D array could provide acceptable 2D grayscale image quality for the general diagnosis purpose. The aim of this study is to compare the 2D image quality of a 3D intracavitary transducer with a conventional 2D intracavitary transducer using clinically relevant phantom experiments.
All measurements were performed on a GE Logiq E9 scanner with both a 2D (IC5-9-D) and a 3D (RIC5-9-D) transducer used in 2D mode. Selection of phantom targets and acquisition parameters were determined from analysis of 33 clinical pelvic exams. Depth of penetration (DOP), contrast response, contrast of anechoic cylinders (diameter: 6.7 mm) at 1.5 and 4.5 cm depths in transverse planes, and in-plane resolution represented by full-width half-maximum of pin targets at multiple depths were measured with transmit frequencies of 7 and 8 MHz. Spherical signal-noise-ratio (SNR) (diameter: 4 and 2 mm) at multiple depths were measured at 8 MHz.
RIC5-9-D demonstrated <8% decrease in DOP for both transmit frequencies (7 MHz: 69.7 ± 8.2 mm; 8 MHz: 64.3 ± 7.8 mm) compared with those from IC5-9-D (7 MHz: 73.9 ± 4.4 mm; 8 MHz: 69.4 ± 7.8 mm). A decreased anechoic contrast was observed with a 4.5 cm depth for RIC5-9-D (7 MHz: 23.2 ± 1.8 dB, P > 0.05; 8 MHz: 17.7 ± 0.9 dB, P < 0.01) compared with IC5-9-D (7 MHz: 25.9 ± 1.2 dB; 8 MHz: 21.5 ± 0.8 dB). The contrast response and spatial resolution performance were comparable between the two transducers. RIC5-9-D showed comparable SNR of anechoic spheres compared to IC5-9-D.
2D images from a 3D probe exhibited comparable overall image quality for routine clinical pelvic imaging.
目前尚不清楚具有特殊机械摆动设计或 2D 阵列的 3D 换能器是否可为常规诊断目的提供可接受的 2D 灰阶图像质量。本研究旨在使用临床相关的体模实验比较 3D 腔内换能器与传统 2D 腔内换能器的 2D 图像质量。
所有测量均在 GE Logiq E9 扫描仪上进行,使用 2D(IC5-9-D)和 3D(RIC5-9-D)换能器以 2D 模式进行。通过对 33 例盆腔临床检查的分析,确定了体模目标和采集参数的选择。在横向平面和 1.5 和 4.5cm 深度处,使用 7 和 8MHz 的发射频率测量穿透深度(DOP)、对比响应、直径为 6.7mm 的无回声圆柱体的对比、代表多个深度处针靶全宽半最大值的平面内分辨率,以及在多个深度处使用 8MHz 测量直径为 4 和 2mm 的球形信号噪声比(SNR)。
与 IC5-9-D(7MHz:73.9±4.4mm;8MHz:69.4±7.8mm)相比,RIC5-9-D 在两种发射频率下的 DOP 降低均小于 8%(7MHz:69.7±8.2mm;8MHz:64.3±7.8mm)。在 4.5cm 深度处观察到 RIC5-9-D 的无回声对比度降低(7MHz:23.2±1.8dB,P>0.05;8MHz:17.7±0.9dB,P<0.01),而与 IC5-9-D 相比(7MHz:25.9±1.2dB;8MHz:21.5±0.8dB)。两种换能器的对比响应和空间分辨率性能相当。RIC5-9-D 显示出与 IC5-9-D 相当的无回声球体 SNR。
用于常规盆腔成像的 3D 探头的 2D 图像表现出相当的整体图像质量。