Suppr超能文献

疫苗接种后热性惊厥严重程度和结局。

Postvaccination Febrile Seizure Severity and Outcome.

机构信息

National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia;

Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School and.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2019 May;143(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2120.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Febrile seizures (FSs) are a common pediatric condition caused by a sudden rise in temperature, affecting 3% to 5% of children aged ≤6 years. Although vaccination can cause FSs, little is known on whether FSs occurring in the time soon after vaccination (vaccine-proximate febrile seizures [VP-FSs] differ clinically from non-vaccine-proximate febrile seizures [NVP-FSs]). We compared the clinical profile and outcomes of VP-FS to NVP-FS.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study of children aged ≤6 years presenting with their first FS at 1 of 5 Australian pediatric hospitals between May 2013 and June 2014. Clinical features, management, and outcomes were compared between VP-FS and NVP-FS.

RESULTS

Of 1022 first FS cases (median age 19.8 months; interquartile range 13.6-27.6), 67 (6%) were VP-FSs. When comparing VP-FS to NVP-FS, there was no increased risk of prolonged (>1 day) hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 1.61; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.84-3.10), ICU admission (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.10-5.48), seizure duration >15 minutes (OR 1.47; 95% CI 0.73-2.98), repeat FS within 24 hours (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.34-1.89), or requirement for antiepileptic treatment on discharge (OR 1.81; 95% CI 0.41-8.02). VP-FS patients with a laboratory-confirmed infection (12%) were more likely to have a prolonged admission compared with those without.

CONCLUSIONS

VP-FS accounted for a small proportion of all FS hospital presentations. There was no difference in outcomes of VP-FS compared with NVP-FS. This is reassuring data for clinicians and parents of children who experience FS after vaccination and can help guide decisions on revaccination.

摘要

背景

热性惊厥(FS)是一种常见的儿科疾病,由体温突然升高引起,影响 3%至 5%的 6 岁以下儿童。虽然疫苗接种会引起 FS,但对于接种后不久发生的 FS(疫苗相关热性惊厥[VP-FS])与非疫苗相关热性惊厥[NVP-FS]在临床上是否不同知之甚少。我们比较了 VP-FS 与 NVP-FS 的临床特征和结局。

方法

2013 年 5 月至 2014 年 6 月期间,在澳大利亚的 5 家儿科医院,对首次出现 FS 的 1022 名 6 岁以下儿童进行前瞻性队列研究。比较 VP-FS 和 NVP-FS 之间的临床特征、管理和结局。

结果

在 1022 例首次 FS 病例中(中位年龄 19.8 个月;四分位距 13.6-27.6),67 例(6%)为 VP-FS。与 NVP-FS 相比,VP-FS 患者住院时间延长(>1 天)的风险没有增加(比值比[OR]1.61;95%置信区间[95%CI]0.84-3.10),入住 ICU(OR 0.72;95%CI 0.10-5.48),癫痫发作持续时间>15 分钟(OR 1.47;95%CI 0.73-2.98),24 小时内再次发生 FS(OR 0.80;95%CI 0.34-1.89),或出院时需要抗癫痫治疗(OR 1.81;95%CI 0.41-8.02)的风险也没有增加。实验室确诊感染的 VP-FS 患者(12%)比无感染的患者更有可能延长住院时间。

结论

VP-FS 占所有 FS 住院患者的比例较小。与 NVP-FS 相比,VP-FS 的结局没有差异。这为接种疫苗后出现 FS 的儿童的临床医生和家长提供了令人安心的数据,并有助于指导重新接种疫苗的决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验