• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疫苗接种后热性惊厥严重程度和结局。

Postvaccination Febrile Seizure Severity and Outcome.

机构信息

National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia;

Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School and.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2019 May;143(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2120.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2018-2120
PMID:31004046
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Febrile seizures (FSs) are a common pediatric condition caused by a sudden rise in temperature, affecting 3% to 5% of children aged ≤6 years. Although vaccination can cause FSs, little is known on whether FSs occurring in the time soon after vaccination (vaccine-proximate febrile seizures [VP-FSs] differ clinically from non-vaccine-proximate febrile seizures [NVP-FSs]). We compared the clinical profile and outcomes of VP-FS to NVP-FS.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study of children aged ≤6 years presenting with their first FS at 1 of 5 Australian pediatric hospitals between May 2013 and June 2014. Clinical features, management, and outcomes were compared between VP-FS and NVP-FS.

RESULTS

Of 1022 first FS cases (median age 19.8 months; interquartile range 13.6-27.6), 67 (6%) were VP-FSs. When comparing VP-FS to NVP-FS, there was no increased risk of prolonged (>1 day) hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 1.61; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.84-3.10), ICU admission (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.10-5.48), seizure duration >15 minutes (OR 1.47; 95% CI 0.73-2.98), repeat FS within 24 hours (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.34-1.89), or requirement for antiepileptic treatment on discharge (OR 1.81; 95% CI 0.41-8.02). VP-FS patients with a laboratory-confirmed infection (12%) were more likely to have a prolonged admission compared with those without.

CONCLUSIONS

VP-FS accounted for a small proportion of all FS hospital presentations. There was no difference in outcomes of VP-FS compared with NVP-FS. This is reassuring data for clinicians and parents of children who experience FS after vaccination and can help guide decisions on revaccination.

摘要

背景

热性惊厥(FS)是一种常见的儿科疾病,由体温突然升高引起,影响 3%至 5%的 6 岁以下儿童。虽然疫苗接种会引起 FS,但对于接种后不久发生的 FS(疫苗相关热性惊厥[VP-FS])与非疫苗相关热性惊厥[NVP-FS]在临床上是否不同知之甚少。我们比较了 VP-FS 与 NVP-FS 的临床特征和结局。

方法

2013 年 5 月至 2014 年 6 月期间,在澳大利亚的 5 家儿科医院,对首次出现 FS 的 1022 名 6 岁以下儿童进行前瞻性队列研究。比较 VP-FS 和 NVP-FS 之间的临床特征、管理和结局。

结果

在 1022 例首次 FS 病例中(中位年龄 19.8 个月;四分位距 13.6-27.6),67 例(6%)为 VP-FS。与 NVP-FS 相比,VP-FS 患者住院时间延长(>1 天)的风险没有增加(比值比[OR]1.61;95%置信区间[95%CI]0.84-3.10),入住 ICU(OR 0.72;95%CI 0.10-5.48),癫痫发作持续时间>15 分钟(OR 1.47;95%CI 0.73-2.98),24 小时内再次发生 FS(OR 0.80;95%CI 0.34-1.89),或出院时需要抗癫痫治疗(OR 1.81;95%CI 0.41-8.02)的风险也没有增加。实验室确诊感染的 VP-FS 患者(12%)比无感染的患者更有可能延长住院时间。

结论

VP-FS 占所有 FS 住院患者的比例较小。与 NVP-FS 相比,VP-FS 的结局没有差异。这为接种疫苗后出现 FS 的儿童的临床医生和家长提供了令人安心的数据,并有助于指导重新接种疫苗的决策。

相似文献

1
Postvaccination Febrile Seizure Severity and Outcome.疫苗接种后热性惊厥严重程度和结局。
Pediatrics. 2019 May;143(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2120.
2
Developmental outcomes following vaccine-proximate febrile seizures in children.儿童疫苗相关性热性惊厥后的发育结局。
Neurology. 2020 Jul 21;95(3):e226-e238. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009876. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
3
Status epilepticus following vaccination in children aged ≤24 months: A five-year retrospective observational study.24 月龄以下儿童疫苗接种后癫痫持续状态:一项为期五年的回顾性观察研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2022 Mar;128:108579. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108579. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
4
Inpatient admission for febrile seizure and subsequent outcomes do not differ in children with vaccine-associated versus non-vaccine associated febrile seizures.与疫苗相关的热性惊厥患儿和非疫苗相关的热性惊厥患儿相比,因热性惊厥住院及随后的转归并无差异。
Vaccine. 2014 Nov 12;32(48):6408-14. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.09.055. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
5
Evaluation of Combination Measles-Mumps-Rubella-Varicella Vaccine Introduction in Australia.澳大利亚引入麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹-水痘联合疫苗的评估
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Oct 1;171(10):992-998. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1965.
6
Distribution of febrile seizure duration and associations with development.热性惊厥持续时间的分布及其与发育的关系。
Ann Neurol. 2011 Jul;70(1):93-100. doi: 10.1002/ana.22368. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
7
Risk factors for acute encephalitis and early seizure recurrence in complex febrile seizures.复杂性热性惊厥患者发生急性脑炎和早期癫痫复发的危险因素。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Aug;181(8):3103-3110. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04529-1. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
8
[Evaluating a child after a febrile seizure: Insights on three important issues].[热性惊厥后评估儿童:关于三个重要问题的见解]
Arch Pediatr. 2017 Nov;24(11):1137-1146. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
9
Exploring the risk factors for vaccine-associated and non-vaccine associated febrile seizures in a large pediatric cohort.探讨大型儿科队列中疫苗相关和非疫苗相关热性惊厥的危险因素。
Vaccine. 2014 May 7;32(22):2574-81. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.03.044. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
10
Predictors of unprovoked seizure after febrile seizure: short-term outcomes.热性惊厥后无诱因癫痫发作的预测因素:短期结局
Brain Dev. 2015 Mar;37(3):315-21. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF FEBRILE SEIZURES DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: A CANADIAN IMMUNIZATION MONITORING PROGRAM-ACTIVE (IMPACT) STUDY.COVID-19大流行期间热性惊厥的流行病学:一项加拿大免疫监测项目-主动(IMPACT)研究。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2025 Feb 18;44(6):e230-3. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000004759.
2
SMS-Based Active Surveillance of Adverse Events following Immunization in Children: The VigiVax Study.基于短信的儿童免疫接种后不良事件主动监测:VigiVax研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Sep 20;12(9):1076. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12091076.
3
Active Vaccine Safety Surveillance: Global Trends and Challenges in China.
活性疫苗安全性监测:中国的全球趋势与挑战
Health Data Sci. 2021 Jun 12;2021:9851067. doi: 10.34133/2021/9851067. eCollection 2021.
4
The baseline risk of multiple febrile seizures in the same febrile illness: a meta-analysis.同一发热疾病中多次热性惊厥的基线风险:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Jun;181(6):2201-2213. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04431-w. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
5
Study of Febrile Seizure among Hospitalized Children of a Tertiary Centre of Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.尼泊尔一家三级中心住院儿童热性惊厥的研究:描述性横断面研究。
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2021 Jul 1;59(238):526-530. doi: 10.31729/jnma.6092.
6
From program suspension to the pandemic: A qualitative examination of Australia's vaccine pharmacovigilance system over 10 years.从项目暂停到疫情:对澳大利亚疫苗药物警戒系统 10 年来的定性研究
Vaccine. 2021 Sep 24;39(40):5968-5981. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.07.059. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
7
Active surveillance of acute paediatric hospitalisations demonstrates the impact of vaccination programmes and informs vaccine policy in Canada and Australia.对急性儿科住院病例的主动监测,展示了疫苗接种计划在加拿大和澳大利亚的影响,并为疫苗政策提供了信息。
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jun;25(25). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.25.1900562.