Child Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2019 Jun;54(6):907-913. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24336. Epub 2019 Apr 21.
BACKGROUND: Obtaining lower airway specimens is important for guiding therapy in chronic lung infection but is difficult in young children unable to expectorate. While culture-based studies have assessed the diagnostic accuracy of nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal specimens for identifying lower airway infection, none have used both together. We compared respiratory bacterial pathogens cultured from nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cultures as the "gold standard" to better inform the diagnosis of lower airway infection in children with chronic wet cough. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs and BAL fluid specimens were collected concurrently from consecutive children undergoing flexible bronchoscopy for chronic cough and cultured for bacterial pathogens. RESULTS: In cultures from 309 children (median age, 2.3 years) with chronic endobronchial suppuration, all main pathogens detected (Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Moraxella catarrhalis) were more prevalent in nasopharyngeal than oropharyngeal swabs (37%, 34%, and 23% vs 21%, 6.2%, and 3.2%, respectively). Positive and negative predictive values for lower airway infection by any of these three pathogens were 63% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 55, 70) and 85% (95% CI, 78, 91) for nasopharyngeal swabs, 65% (95% CI, 54, 75), and 66% (95% CI, 59, 72) for oropharyngeal swabs, and 61% (95% CI, 54,68), and 88% (95% CI, 81, 93) for both swabs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Neither nasopharyngeal nor oropharyngeal swabs, alone or in combination, reliably predicted lower airway infection in children with chronic wet cough. Although upper airway specimens may be useful for bacterial carriage studies and monitoring antimicrobial resistance, their clinical utility in pediatric chronic lung disorders of endobronchial suppuration is limited.
背景:获取下呼吸道标本对于指导慢性肺部感染的治疗非常重要,但对于无法咳痰的幼儿来说,这是困难的。虽然基于培养的研究已经评估了鼻咽或口咽标本对于识别下呼吸道感染的诊断准确性,但没有一项研究同时使用这两种标本。我们将从鼻咽和口咽拭子中培养的呼吸道细菌病原体与支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)培养物进行比较,将后者作为“金标准”,以更好地为患有慢性湿咳的儿童的下呼吸道感染提供诊断依据。
方法:对连续接受支气管镜检查以治疗慢性咳嗽的儿童同时采集鼻咽和口咽拭子以及 BAL 液标本,并对其进行细菌病原体培养。
结果:在 309 名患有慢性支气管内化脓性感染的儿童的培养物中(中位年龄为 2.3 岁),所有检测到的主要病原体(流感嗜血杆菌、肺炎链球菌和卡他莫拉菌)在鼻咽拭子中的检出率均高于口咽拭子(分别为 37%、34%和 23%比 21%、6.2%和 3.2%)。这三种病原体中任何一种导致下呼吸道感染的阳性和阴性预测值,鼻咽拭子分别为 63%(95%置信区间 [95%CI] 55,70)和 85%(95%CI,78,91),口咽拭子分别为 65%(95%CI,54,75)和 66%(95%CI,59,72),两者均为 61%(95%CI,54,68)和 88%(95%CI,81,93)。
结论:鼻咽和口咽拭子单独或联合使用,均不能可靠地预测患有慢性湿咳的儿童的下呼吸道感染。尽管上呼吸道标本可能对细菌携带研究和监测抗菌药物耐药性有用,但它们在儿童慢性肺部疾病(如支气管内化脓性感染)中的临床应用有限。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2019-4-21
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025-2-7
BMC Pulm Med. 2022-5-17
Children (Basel). 2021-12-8