Siegler James E, Swaminathan Balakumar, Giruparajah Mohana, Bosch Jackie, Perera Kanjana S, Hart Robert G, Kasner Scott E
Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada.
Eur Stroke J. 2016 Jun;1(2):130-138. doi: 10.1177/2396987316652265. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
Incomplete evaluation of stroke patients may result in an unclear diagnosis. Our objective was to determine if older stroke patients more often undergo incomplete diagnostic evaluations versus younger patients in an international cohort. The Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source Global Registry was a retrospective cohort of consecutive stroke patients evaluated at 19 stroke centers in 19 countries. Diagnostic evaluation was considered as complete if the patient had, at a minimum, brain computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging with evidence of infarction, extracranial and intracranial vascular imaging, electrocardiography, ≥24 h of cardiac rhythm monitoring, and echocardiography. Patients were diagnosed with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source if brain imaging confirmed a nonlacunar infarction and no stroke etiology was determined after complete evaluation. Completeness of evaluation was compared between patients ≥75 versus <75 years old. The registry included 2132 patients with recent ischemic stroke during 2013-2014, of which 349 were diagnosed with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source. Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source patients ≥75 years were less likely to undergo brain magnetic resonance imaging (74% versus 89%, p = 0.001), transesophageal echocardiography (22% versus 39%, p = 0.005), and combination transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography (16% versus 32%, p = 0.005) compared with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source patients <75 years. Our study has identified an international age disparity in fundamental diagnostic testing for older patients with stroke of unknown etiology. Some testing biases were affected by geographic location (e.g., brain MRI was less frequently used in European ESUS patients), whereas other testing was implemented less frequently in the elderly regardless of location (e.g., transesophageal echocardiogram). Older patients in this international cohort had less sophisticated diagnostic testing for stroke, despite advanced age being well established as an independent risk factor for recurrent stroke. This was a global problem and further investigations are warranted to explore the cause.
对中风患者的评估不完整可能导致诊断不明确。我们的目标是确定在一个国际队列中,老年中风患者与年轻患者相比,是否更常接受不完整的诊断评估。不明来源栓塞性中风全球注册研究是一项对在19个国家的19个中风中心接受评估的连续中风患者进行的回顾性队列研究。如果患者至少进行了脑部计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像且有梗死证据、颅外和颅内血管成像、心电图、≥24小时的心律监测以及超声心动图检查,则诊断评估被视为完整。如果脑部成像证实为非腔隙性梗死且在完整评估后未确定中风病因,则患者被诊断为不明来源栓塞性中风。比较了年龄≥75岁与<75岁患者的评估完整性。该注册研究纳入了2013 - 2014年期间2132例近期缺血性中风患者,其中349例被诊断为不明来源栓塞性中风。与年龄<75岁的不明来源栓塞性中风患者相比,年龄≥75岁的不明来源栓塞性中风患者接受脑部磁共振成像检查的可能性较小(74%对89%,p = 0.001)、经食管超声心动图检查的可能性较小(22%对39% , p = 0.005)以及经胸和经食管联合超声心动图检查的可能性较小(16%对32% , p = 0.005)。我们的研究发现,在对病因不明的老年中风患者进行基本诊断检测方面存在国际年龄差异。一些检测偏差受地理位置影响(例如,欧洲不明来源栓塞性中风患者较少使用脑部磁共振成像),而其他检测在老年人中无论地理位置如何使用频率都较低(例如,经食管超声心动图)。在这个国际队列中,老年患者对中风的诊断检测不够完善,尽管高龄已被确认为复发性中风的独立危险因素。这是一个全球性问题,有必要进一步调查以探究原因。