Logan Andrew J, Gordon Gael E, Loffler Gunter
School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
Department of Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
J Vis. 2019 Apr 1;19(4):23. doi: 10.1167/19.4.23.
We investigated how information from face features is combined by comparing sensitivity to individual features with that for external (head shape, hairline) and internal (nose, mouth, eyes, eyebrows) feature compounds. Discrimination thresholds were measured for synthetic faces under the following conditions: (a) full-faces; (b) individual features (e.g., nose); and (c) feature compounds (either external or internal). Individual features and feature compounds were presented both in isolation and embedded within a fixed, task irrelevant face context. Relative to the full-face baseline, threshold elevations for the internal feature compound (2.41x) were comparable to those for the most sensitive individual feature (nose = 2.12x). External features demonstrated the same pattern. A model that incorporated all available feature information within a single channel in an efficient way overestimated sensitivity to feature compounds. Embedding individual features within a task-irrelevant context reduced discrimination sensitivity, relative to isolated presentation. Sensitivity to feature compounds, however, was unaffected by embedding. A loss of sensitivity when embedding features within a fixed-face context is consistent with holistic processing, which limits access to information about individual features. However, holistic combination of information across face features is not efficient: Sensitivity to feature compounds is no better than sensitivity to the best individual feature. No effect of embedding internal feature compounds within task-irrelevant external face features (or vice versa) suggests that external and internal features are processed independently.
我们通过比较对个体特征与外部(头部形状、发际线)和内部(鼻子、嘴巴、眼睛、眉毛)特征组合的敏感度,来研究面部特征信息是如何被整合的。在以下条件下测量合成面部的辨别阈值:(a) 全脸;(b) 个体特征(如鼻子);以及 (c) 特征组合(外部或内部)。个体特征和特征组合既单独呈现,也嵌入到一个固定的、与任务无关的面部情境中。相对于全脸基线,内部特征组合的阈值升高(2.41倍)与最敏感的个体特征(鼻子 = 2.12倍)相当。外部特征呈现出相同的模式。一个在单个通道中有效整合所有可用特征信息的模型高估了对特征组合的敏感度。相对于单独呈现,将个体特征嵌入到与任务无关的情境中会降低辨别敏感度。然而,对特征组合的敏感度不受嵌入的影响。在固定面部情境中嵌入特征时敏感度的降低与整体加工一致,整体加工限制了对个体特征信息的获取。然而,跨面部特征的信息整体组合并不高效:对特征组合的敏感度并不比对最佳个体特征的敏感度更好。将内部特征组合嵌入到与任务无关的外部面部特征中(反之亦然)没有影响,这表明外部和内部特征是独立加工的。