School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Research Centre for Rural Health Service, Key Research Institute of Humanities & Social Sciences of Hubei Provincial Department of Education, Wuhan 430030, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 14;16(8):1336. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081336.
The weak primary healthcare system in China brings challenges to the national strategy of primary medical institutions providing general health needs for patients with non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It is necessary to explore the potential discrepancies in health status for patients with NCDs if they go to primary medical institutions rather than high-level hospitals. Data was obtained from Surveillance of Health-seeking Behavior in Hubei Province. Respondents were investigated six times to collect information on health service utilization and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Ninety-two hypertension patients who went to medical institutions of the same level were included. HRQoL was measured by the Chinese version of EQ-5D-3L. A multilevel growth curve model was applied to analyze whether provider level could influence HRQoL. The utility score and visual analogue scale (VAS) of patients varied insignificantly over six months ( > 0.05). A growth curve model showed that comorbidity was the only factor significantly influencing utility score ( = 0.019). Time and comorbidity were the only influencing factors of VAS ( < 0.05). Our findings indicated that the level of healthcare provider had no significant impact on the health status of patients with NCDs. As such, this study concludes that the primary healthcare system in China is qualified to be the health gatekeeper for NCDs patients.
中国薄弱的初级医疗体系给国家初级医疗机构满足非传染性疾病(NCD)患者基本医疗需求的战略带来了挑战。如果 NCD 患者选择去基层医疗机构而不是高级别医院,那么有必要探索他们的健康状况是否存在潜在差异。本研究数据来自湖北省卫生服务调查。共调查了 92 名高血压患者,这些患者在同一级别医疗机构就诊,6 次收集其卫生服务利用情况和健康相关生命质量(HRQoL)信息。采用 EQ-5D-3L 量表测量 HRQoL,应用多水平增长曲线模型分析提供者水平是否会影响 HRQoL。结果显示,患者的效用评分和视觉模拟评分(VAS)在 6 个月内差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。增长曲线模型显示,合并症是唯一显著影响效用评分的因素(=0.019)。时间和合并症是唯一影响 VAS 的因素(<0.05)。研究结果表明,医疗服务提供者的水平对 NCD 患者的健康状况没有显著影响。因此,本研究得出结论,中国的初级医疗体系有能力胜任 NCD 患者的健康守门人。