Department of Radiology, Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain.
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jun;42(12):1636-1649. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1590865. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
To evaluate the effectiveness of the Bobath concept in sensorimotor rehabilitation after stroke. A systematic literature review was conducted on the Bobath concept from the first publication available to January 2018, consulting PUBMED, CENTRAL, CINAHL and PEDro databases. Fifteen clinical trials were selected in two consecutive screenings. Two independent researchers rated the studies according to the PEDro scale from which a best evidence synthesis was derived to determine the strength of the evidence. The Bobath concept is not more effective than other approaches used in post-stroke rehabilitation. There is moderate evidence for the superiority of other therapeutic approaches such as forced use of the affected upper limb and constraint-induced movement therapy for motor control of the upper limb. The Bobath concept is not superior to other approaches for regaining mobility, motor control of the lower limb and gait, balance and activities of daily living of patients after stroke. There is moderate evidence regarding the superior results of other approaches in terms of the motor control and dexterity of the upper limb. Due to the limitations concerning the methodological quality of the studies, further well-designed studies are needed.Implications for rehabilitationThe Bobath concept is not superior to other approaches for patients after stroke.The treatments that incorporate overuse of the affected upper limb via intensive treatments with high-repetitions with or without robotic aids present greater effectiveness in the motor control of the upper limb and dexterity.
评估 Bobath 概念在脑卒中后感觉运动康复中的有效性。对 Bobath 概念从最早发表的文献到 2018 年 1 月进行了系统的文献回顾,查阅了 PUBMED、CENTRAL、CINAHL 和 PEDro 数据库。在两次连续筛选中选择了 15 项临床试验。两名独立的研究人员根据 PEDro 量表对研究进行了评估,从中得出了最佳证据综合,以确定证据的强度。Bobath 概念并不比其他用于脑卒中后康复的方法更有效。有中等证据表明,其他治疗方法(如强制性使用患侧上肢和强制性运动疗法)对上肢运动控制具有优越性。Bobath 概念在恢复运动能力、下肢运动控制和步态、平衡和脑卒中患者的日常生活活动方面并不优于其他方法。关于其他方法在上肢运动控制和灵巧性方面的优越结果有中等证据。由于研究方法学质量的限制,需要进一步设计良好的研究。
Bobath 概念在脑卒中患者中并不优于其他方法。
通过高重复次数的强化治疗,包括使用或不使用机器人辅助,过度使用患侧上肢的治疗方法对上肢运动控制和灵巧性具有更大的效果。