Baines Georgina, Price Natalia, Jefferis Helen, Cartwright Rufus, Jackson Simon R
King's College Hospital, Suite 8, Golden Jubilee Wing, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RD, UK.
Oxford University Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Sep;30(9):1475-1481. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03952-7. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
Apical vaginal support for post-hysterectomy vault prolapse can be provided by vaginal, abdominal, or laparoscopic routes. Sacrocolpopexy is associated with higher satisfaction rates and a lower re-operation rate than vaginal sacrospinous fixation. The laparoscopic approach can reduce hospital stay and blood loss. There are concerns about the use of mesh in urogynaecological procedures, but limited data indicate a low mesh complication rate with sacrocolpopexy (0-5%). This study was aimed at establishing the incidence of complications following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
We carried out a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy at a large tertiary hospital. Cases were identified from coding data, theatre logs and the national urogynaecology procedure database. Data were gathered from theatre records, patient notes and the national database. Demographic data, concomitant procedures performed, duration of surgery, intra-operative complications, change in pelvic organ prolapse quantification point C, duration of stay, late complications and further urogynaecological surgery were assessed.
A total of 660 patients underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy between 2005 and 2017 (median time from surgery 4 years 3 months). Five cases (0.7%) developed vaginal mesh exposure. Two were successfully managed conservatively with topical oestrogen. Three required surgical excision of the mesh. Four patients (0.6%) presented with erosion of non-absorbable vaginal sutures. Two were successfully managed conservatively with topical oestrogen and oral antibiotics. Two were managed with vaginal suture excision.
This large series suggests that laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy might confer a low risk of mesh exposure. Together with good anatomical and patient-reported outcomes, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is a safe option for patients presenting with post-hysterectomy vault prolapse.
子宫切除术后穹窿脱垂的阴道顶端支撑可通过经阴道、经腹或腹腔镜途径实现。骶棘韧带固定术相比阴道骶棘韧带固定术,患者满意度更高,再次手术率更低。腹腔镜手术方式可缩短住院时间并减少出血量。泌尿妇科手术中使用网片引发了一些担忧,但有限的数据表明骶棘韧带固定术的网片并发症发生率较低(0 - 5%)。本研究旨在确定腹腔镜骶棘韧带固定术后并发症的发生率。
我们对一家大型三级医院接受腹腔镜骶棘韧带固定术的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。通过编码数据、手术记录和国家泌尿妇科手术数据库确定病例。数据收集自手术记录、患者病历和国家数据库。评估人口统计学数据、同期进行的手术、手术时长、术中并发症、盆腔器官脱垂量化点C的变化、住院时长、远期并发症以及进一步的泌尿妇科手术情况。
2005年至2017年间,共有660例患者接受了腹腔镜骶棘韧带固定术(手术中位时间为4年3个月)。5例(0.7%)出现阴道网片外露。2例通过局部使用雌激素成功保守治疗。3例需要手术切除网片。4例(0.6%)出现不可吸收阴道缝线侵蚀。2例通过局部使用雌激素和口服抗生素成功保守治疗。2例进行了阴道缝线切除。
这个大型系列研究表明,腹腔镜骶棘韧带固定术可能导致网片外露的风险较低。结合良好的解剖学和患者报告结局,腹腔镜骶棘韧带固定术对于子宫切除术后穹窿脱垂患者是一种安全的选择。