Departamento de Ecología Tropical, Campus de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Merida, Mexico.
Departamento de Sistemas Físicos, Químicos y Naturales, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla, Spain.
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2019 Sep;21(5):805-812. doi: 10.1111/plb.13002. Epub 2019 May 23.
Identifying the mechanisms of compensation to insect herbivory remains a major challenge in plant biology and evolutionary ecology. Most previous studies have addressed plant compensatory responses to one or two levels of insect herbivory, and the underlying traits mediating such responses remain elusive in many cases. We evaluated responses associated with compensation to multiple intensities of leaf damage (0% control, 10%, 25%, 50%, 75% of leaf area removed) by means of mechanical removal of foliar tissue and application of a caterpillar (Spodoptera exigua) oral secretions in 3-month-old wild cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum). Four weeks post-treatment, we measured plant growth and multiple traits associated with compensation, namely: changes in above- and belowground, biomass and the concentration of nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) and non-structural carbon reserves (starch and soluble sugars) in roots, stems and leaves. We found that wild cotton fully compensated in terms of growth and biomass allocation when leaf damage was low (10%), whereas moderate (25%) to high leaf damage in some cases led to under-compensation. Nonetheless, high levels of leaf removal (50% and 75%) in most cases did not cause further reductions in height and allocation to leaf and stem biomass relative to low and moderate damage. There were significant positive effects of leaf damage on P concentration in leaves and stems, but not roots, as well as a negative effect on soluble sugars in roots. These results indicate that wild cotton fully compensated for a low level of leaf damage but under-compensated under moderate to high leaf damage, but can nonetheless sustain growth despite increasing losses to herbivory. Such responses were possibly mediated by a re-allocation of carbohydrate reserves from roots to shoots.
鉴定昆虫食草性的补偿机制仍然是植物生物学和进化生态学的主要挑战。大多数先前的研究都集中在植物对一到两种程度的昆虫食草性的补偿反应上,而在许多情况下,介导这些反应的潜在特征仍然难以捉摸。我们通过机械去除叶片组织和应用毛毛虫(Spodoptera exigua)口腔分泌物来评估与多种叶片损伤强度(0%对照、10%、25%、50%、75%叶片面积去除)相关的响应,在 3 个月大的野生棉植株(Gossypium hirsutum)上进行了实验。在处理后 4 周,我们测量了植物的生长和与补偿相关的多个特征,即:地上和地下生物量以及养分(氮和磷)和非结构性碳储备(淀粉和可溶性糖)在根、茎和叶中的浓度变化。我们发现,当叶片损伤较低(10%)时,野生棉花在生长和生物量分配方面完全补偿,但在某些情况下,中等(25%)至高水平叶片损伤会导致补偿不足。尽管如此,在大多数情况下,高叶片去除(50%和 75%)相对于低和中水平损伤不会导致高度和叶片和茎生物量分配的进一步减少。叶片损伤对叶片和茎中的磷浓度有显著的正影响,但对根中的磷浓度没有影响,而对根中的可溶性糖有负影响。这些结果表明,野生棉花完全补偿了低水平的叶片损伤,但在中等至高水平的叶片损伤下补偿不足,但尽管受到越来越多的食草性损失,仍能维持生长。这些反应可能是通过碳水化合物储备从根部重新分配到地上部分介导的。