Suppr超能文献

成人退行性脊柱侧凸患者使用手杖和助行器行走时步态中肌肉活动的比较。

A Comparison of Muscular Activity During Gait Between Walking Sticks and a Walker in Patients With Adult Degenerative Scoliosis.

作者信息

Haddas Ram, Lieberman Isador H, Kakar Rumit Singh

机构信息

Texas Back Institute Research Foundation, Plano, TX 75093, USA.

Texas Back Institute, 6020 W Parker Rd #200, Plano, TX 75093, USA.

出版信息

Spine Deform. 2019 May;7(3):454-466. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.09.067.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A repeated measurement, single-center, prospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to compare and contrast the benefits of walking sticks versus a walker on the trunk and lower extremity muscular control in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

ADS patients demonstrate an altered gait pattern. Walking aids help maintain mobility in those patients. Whereas a walker forces patients into kyphosis, the higher grips of walking sticks allows for more upright posture, arm swing, and improved sagittal alignment.

METHODS

Twenty ADS patients with symptomatic degenerative scoliosis performed over-ground walking at self-selected speed under 3 testing conditions: 1) with walking sticks (WS); 2) with walker (WR); and 3) without any device (ND). Trunk and lower extremity peak muscle activation, time to peak muscle activity, muscle duration, muscle onset, and integrated electromyography (iEMG) were measured and compared.

RESULTS

The use of WS produced increases in muscle activity in the external oblique (WS: 44.3% vs. WR: 7.4% of submaximum voluntary contraction [sMVC], p = .007) and medial gastrocnemius (WS: 78.8% vs ND: 43.7% of sMVC, p = .027) in comparison to the walker and no device, respectively. When using WS, shorter muscle activity time was observed for rectus femoris (WS: 62.9% vs. WR: 88.8% of gait cycle, p = .001), semitendinosus (WS: 64.3% vs. WR: 93.0% of gait cycle, p = .003), tibialis anterius (WS: 59.4% vs. WR: 85.1% of gait cycle, p = .001), and medial gastrocnemius (WS: 67.3% vs. WR: 98.0% of gait cycle, p = .006) in comparison to the walker.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of walking sticks can potentially promote trunk and lower extremity neuromuscular control and gait mechanics comparable to gait without any assistive devices. Although the differences in magnitudes between comparisons were small and should be cautiously interpreted on a case-by-case basis, based on this study's results and our anecdotal experience treating patients with ADS, we recommend the use of walking sticks to assist with their gait prior to and after surgical intervention.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

摘要

研究设计

一项重复测量、单中心前瞻性研究。

目的

本研究旨在比较和对比手杖与助行器对成年退行性脊柱侧凸(ADS)患者躯干及下肢肌肉控制的益处。

背景数据总结

ADS患者表现出步态模式改变。助行器有助于这些患者保持行动能力。与助行器迫使患者形成驼背不同,手杖较高的握把能让患者保持更直立的姿势、摆动双臂并改善矢状面排列。

方法

20例有症状的退行性脊柱侧凸ADS患者在3种测试条件下以自选速度进行地面行走:1)使用手杖(WS);2)使用助行器(WR);3)不使用任何器械(ND)。测量并比较躯干和下肢肌肉峰值激活、肌肉活动达到峰值的时间、肌肉持续时间、肌肉起始时间以及肌电图积分(iEMG)。

结果

与使用助行器和不使用任何器械相比,使用手杖时腹外斜肌(WS:44.3%,而WR:7.4%的次最大自主收缩[sMVC],p = 0.007)和腓肠肌内侧头(WS:78.8%,而ND:43.7%的sMVC,p = 0.027)的肌肉活动增加。与使用助行器相比,使用手杖时股直肌(WS:62.9%,而WR:88.8%的步态周期,p = 0.001)、半腱肌(WS:64.3%,而WR:93.0%的步态周期,p = 0.003)、胫骨前肌(WS:59.4%,而WR:85.1%的步态周期,p = 0.001)和腓肠肌内侧头(WS:67.3%,而WR:98.0%的步态周期,p = 0.006)的肌肉活动时间更短。

结论

使用手杖可能会促进躯干和下肢神经肌肉控制以及步态力学,使其与不使用任何辅助器械时的步态相当。尽管比较之间的差异幅度较小,应根据具体情况谨慎解释,但基于本研究结果以及我们治疗ADS患者的经验,我们建议在手术干预前后使用手杖辅助患者行走。

证据级别

三级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验